Abstract. One of the key priorities for disaster risk reduction is to ensure
decision makers, stakeholders, and the public understand their exposure to
disaster risk, so that they can take protective action. Flood maps are a
potentially valuable tool for facilitating this understanding of flood risk,
but previous research has found that they vary considerably in availability
and quality. Using an evaluation framework comprising nine criteria grounded
in existing scholarship, this study assessed the quality of flood maps
available to the public in Canadian communities located in designated flood
risk areas. It found that flood maps in most municipalities (62 %) are
low quality (meeting less than 50 % of the criteria) and the highest score
was 78 % (seven of nine criteria met). The findings suggest that a more concerted
effort to produce high-quality, publicly accessible flood maps is required to
support Canada's international commitment to disaster risk reduction. Further
questions surround possible weighting of quality assessment criteria, whether
and how individuals seek out flood maps, and how flood risk information could
be better communicated using modern technology.
This study integrates novel data on 100-year flood hazard extents, exposure of residential properties, and place-based social vulnerability to comprehensively assess and compare flood risk between Indigenous communities living on 985 reserve lands and other Canadian communities across 3701 census subdivisions. National-scale exposure of residential properties to fluvial, pluvial, and coastal flooding was estimated at the 100-year return period. A social vulnerability index (SVI) was developed and included 49 variables from the national census that represent demographic, social, economic, cultural, and infrastructure/community indicators of vulnerability. Geographic information system-based bivariate choropleth mapping of the composite SVI scores and of flood exposure of residential properties and population was completed to assess the spatial variation of flood risk. We found that about 81% of the 985 Indigenous land reserves had some flood exposure that impacted either population or residential properties. Our analysis indicates that residential property-level flood exposure is similar between non-Indigenous and Indigenous communities, but socioeconomic vulnerability is higher on reserve lands, which confirms that the overall risk of Indigenous communities is higher. Findings suggest the need for more local verification of flood risk in Indigenous communities to address uncertainty in national scale analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.