Proceedings of the Sixth Named Entity Workshop 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w16-2701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Entity Linking and Related Language Projection to Improve Name Transliteration

Abstract: Traditional name transliteration methods largely ignore source context information and inter-dependency among entities for entity disambiguation. We propose a novel approach to leverage state-of-the-art Entity Linking (EL) techniques to automatically correct name transliteration results, using collective inference from source contexts and additional evidence from knowledge base. Experiments on transliterating names from seven languages to English demonstrate that our approach achieves 2.6% to 15.7% absolute ga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, even though romanization is fairly well-studied and are easily attainable through tools like URoman, the opposite direction is fairly understudied. Most of the related work has focused on either to-English transliteration specifically (Lin et al, 2016;Durrani et al, 2014) or on named entity transliteration (Kundu et al, 2018;Grundkiewicz and Heafield, 2018). Even then, the state-of-the-art results on the recent NEWS named entity transliteration task (Chen et al, 2018) ranged from 10% to 80% in terms of accuracy across several scripts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, even though romanization is fairly well-studied and are easily attainable through tools like URoman, the opposite direction is fairly understudied. Most of the related work has focused on either to-English transliteration specifically (Lin et al, 2016;Durrani et al, 2014) or on named entity transliteration (Kundu et al, 2018;Grundkiewicz and Heafield, 2018). Even then, the state-of-the-art results on the recent NEWS named entity transliteration task (Chen et al, 2018) ranged from 10% to 80% in terms of accuracy across several scripts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our constrained inference strategy is much simpler, requiring only a name dictionary N . We experimentally show that our approach outperforms that of Lin et al (2016).…”
Section: Other Strategies In Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the area of contraint-based discovery, our methodology most closely resembles the constrained discovery systems of Lin et al (2016) and particularly Upadhyay et al (2018). Starting from a high-quality seed, a learning algorithm generalizes observed patterns, iteratively increasing the seed data with confident examples, while discarding examples that fail to pass certain heuristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%