2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Bluetooth co-location traces in group discovery algorithms

Abstract: Smart phones can collect and share Bluetooth co-location traces to identify ad hoc or semi-permanent social groups, which can enhance recommender systems or allow detection of epidemic events. Group discovery using Bluetooth co-location is practical due to low power consumption, short range, and applicability to decentralization. This paper presents the Group Discovery using Co-location traces (GDC) and Decentralized GDC (DGDC) algorithms, which leverage user meeting frequency and duration to accurately detect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graph clustering has been used in a lot of research to find social groups in which a network is separated into disjoint communities using clustering techniques [40]. Several studies on community detection have been published based on network members' contact histories, such as encounter frequency and length, and on a person's total number of previous contacts [41], [42]. Authors in [41] proposed group discovery using co-location (GDC) and decentralized GDC (DGDC) methods, which use the frequency and length of meetings to reliably discover groups.…”
Section: Social Correlation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Graph clustering has been used in a lot of research to find social groups in which a network is separated into disjoint communities using clustering techniques [40]. Several studies on community detection have been published based on network members' contact histories, such as encounter frequency and length, and on a person's total number of previous contacts [41], [42]. Authors in [41] proposed group discovery using co-location (GDC) and decentralized GDC (DGDC) methods, which use the frequency and length of meetings to reliably discover groups.…”
Section: Social Correlation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on community detection have been published based on network members' contact histories, such as encounter frequency and length, and on a person's total number of previous contacts [41], [42]. Authors in [41] proposed group discovery using co-location (GDC) and decentralized GDC (DGDC) methods, which use the frequency and length of meetings to reliably discover groups. In [42], the authors used models that can reliably assess, predict, and cluster multi-modal data from people and groups within a population's social network to reveal the structure inherent in everyday activities.…”
Section: Social Correlation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies were conducted to detect social communities using graph clustering [24,37] where a network was divided into disjoint communities by using clustering techniques. There were several studies on community detection based on the contact history of members in the network, e.g., encounter frequency and duration [38] and the total number of past encounters of a person [39]. Eagle and Pentland represented the behavior of individuals from a set of primary vectors called eigenbehaviors [39].…”
Section: Social Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], Boston et al proposed an algorithm for detecting social groups based on Bluetooth traces. They employed the frequency and duration of users' meetings in order to group users.…”
Section: Social Structure Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%