1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf02558676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of scientific enquiry in university science laboratory classes: Implications for curriculum deliberations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an environment where the instructor has the opportunity to make significant changes to the experiment, or even change the pedagogy of the laboratory program, then there are alternate pedagogical approaches that can be considered that lessen the need to have closely integrated or sequenced learning experiences.. Inquiry-oriented strategies apply a hierarchy of levels to practical tasks (Hegarty, 1978), from structured and guided inquiry (Lamba and Creegan, 2008;Schroeder and Greenbowe, 2008) to fully open-ended tasks (Roth, 1994) that can provide opportunities for students to gain higher-order process skills (Roth and Roychoudhury, 1993) and a greater ability to adopt scientific ways of doing (Spronken-Smith and Walker, 2010). These strategies present mechanisms for the empowered instructor to create a self-contained laboratory learning experience that garners the desired student learning outcomes and a positive perception, as well as more elusive higher order skills, such as self-regulation in the laboratory 65 learning environment.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an environment where the instructor has the opportunity to make significant changes to the experiment, or even change the pedagogy of the laboratory program, then there are alternate pedagogical approaches that can be considered that lessen the need to have closely integrated or sequenced learning experiences.. Inquiry-oriented strategies apply a hierarchy of levels to practical tasks (Hegarty, 1978), from structured and guided inquiry (Lamba and Creegan, 2008;Schroeder and Greenbowe, 2008) to fully open-ended tasks (Roth, 1994) that can provide opportunities for students to gain higher-order process skills (Roth and Roychoudhury, 1993) and a greater ability to adopt scientific ways of doing (Spronken-Smith and Walker, 2010). These strategies present mechanisms for the empowered instructor to create a self-contained laboratory learning experience that garners the desired student learning outcomes and a positive perception, as well as more elusive higher order skills, such as self-regulation in the laboratory 65 learning environment.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luker (1985) in her analysis of transcripts of seminars found that the proportion of time spent on lecturing by the tutor varied from as little as 12 per cent to over 90 per cent with a mean of just under 50 per cent. Hegarty (1979) in her study of microbiology laboratory classes found that tutors talked at higher levels of cognition -explaining and justifying -33 per cent of the time at one university whereas tutors at another university used higher levels for only 12 per cent of the time. Generally speaking, it may be inferred that higher cognitive levels of questioning and explaining appear to be related positively with students' perceived satisfaction of small group teaching and laboratory work (Dunkin, 1986).…”
Section: Explaining In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Experiments which rely on 'cookbook instructions' are highly guided, verification-type experiences or activities (Hegarty, 1978). Students follow detailed instructions in order to reach a well-defined, and often already well-established, end-point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%