1999
DOI: 10.1080/13642819908206422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level statistics and localization in a two-dimensional quantum percolation problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same authors [10] and earlier Meir et al [6] found evidence for a localization transition with p q < 1, based on series expansion studies. This contradicts some numerical studies [7,11,16], but agrees with other studies, which use different numerical techniques and also find a transition [14,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same authors [10] and earlier Meir et al [6] found evidence for a localization transition with p q < 1, based on series expansion studies. This contradicts some numerical studies [7,11,16], but agrees with other studies, which use different numerical techniques and also find a transition [14,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Given these limitations one should be cautious to draw conclusions on the critical behavior from series alone. There are however several other publications by independent research groups which give support to the observed behavior [11,14,[17][18][19][20][37][38][39]: • Mookerjee et al [11,40] have listed most of the above references, including the methods which were used and the conclusions. Authors using real space renormalization (RSR), recursion methods (RM), or ThoulessEdwards-Licciardello boundary perturbation methods (TEL) found transitions with p q -values ranging from 0.7 to 1 for either the site or the bond case.…”
Section: Summary Of Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2D, the situation is less clear. Here the physical community is evenly divided: one group 6,7,8,9 favors p 2D q = 1 while another group 10,11,12,13,14,15,16 claims that p 2D q < 1. The most striking argument against p 2D q < 1 comes from oneparameter scaling theory 17 , according to which arbitrary small disorder always leads to localization in 2D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in two dimensions the problem of quantum percolation is still discussed controversially-especially with respect to the existence of a quantum percolation threshold p c ≤ p q ≤ 1, see, e.g., Refs. 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36-we rely on unbiased numerical techniques, which take quantum effects fully into account. To this end we employ the so-called local distribution (LD) approach 37,38 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%