2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.77.245130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical aspects of two-dimensional quantum percolation

Abstract: The existence of a quantum-percolation threshold p q Ͻ 1 in the two-dimensional ͑2D͒ quantum sitepercolation problem has been a controversial issue for a long time. By means of a highly efficient Chebyshev expansion technique we investigate numerically the time evolution of particle states on finite disordered square lattices with system sizes not reachable up to now. After a careful finite-size scaling, our results for the particle's recurrence probability and the distribution function of the local particle d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 a comparison of the average and typical DOS calculated with the DCA and the TMDCA (N c = 4 3 ) as compared with the kernel polynomial method (KPM). [47][48][49][50] In the KPM analysis, instead of diagonalizing the Hamiltonian directly, the local DOS is expressed in term of an infinite series of Chebyshev polynomials. In practice, the truncated series leads to Gibbs oscillations.…”
Section: B Typical Medium Finite Cluster Analysis Of Diagonal and Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 a comparison of the average and typical DOS calculated with the DCA and the TMDCA (N c = 4 3 ) as compared with the kernel polynomial method (KPM). [47][48][49][50] In the KPM analysis, instead of diagonalizing the Hamiltonian directly, the local DOS is expressed in term of an infinite series of Chebyshev polynomials. In practice, the truncated series leads to Gibbs oscillations.…”
Section: B Typical Medium Finite Cluster Analysis Of Diagonal and Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in two dimensions the problem of quantum percolation is still discussed controversially-especially with respect to the existence of a quantum percolation threshold p c ≤ p q ≤ 1, see, e.g., Refs. 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36-we rely on unbiased numerical techniques, which take quantum effects fully into account. To this end we employ the so-called local distribution (LD) approach 37,38 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, we would generally expect quantum fluctuations to lead to backscattering, which may hinder conductance. References [17,40] showed, using large scale numerics with the kernel polynomial methods, that the quantum percolation threshold p q c < 1, and we necessarily have p c ≤ p q c . Furthermore, studies on the Bethe lattice seem to show that the quantum site percolation threshold agrees with the classical threshold [39], and our results are also consistent with the classical site percolation on a square lattice.…”
Section: Iid Delocalization In 2d and Quantum Percolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The honeycomb Kitaev model can itself be understood in terms of itinerant Majorana fermions coupled to static Z 2 gauge fields. Other examples include the resonating valencebond liquid [8,9], slave-particle descriptions of the Hubbard model [10,11], non-Fermi metals [12] and glasses [13], the Falicov-Kimball model [14][15][16][17], etc. While models of lattice gauge theories are often difficult to realize in experiment, recent developments in cold atom quantum simulators have opened possibilities in studying these models, see, e.g., the pioneering experiment on cold ion simulations of the Schwinger model [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%