2014
DOI: 10.17533/udea.iee.v32n3a11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level of involvement of clinical nurses in the evaluation of competence of nursing students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…49 NTS that were assessed included: self-learning and critical thinking 44 ; interpersonal skills 22 ; ethical behavior 44 ; nurse-patient communication 36,44 ; risk prevention 44 ; nursing students' communication performance on advocacy, the therapeutic use of self and validation to patients and family 46 ; and ethical principles and professionalism. 31 The studies presenting the tools in Table 2 were mainly focused on the assessment of clinical competency skills 29 ; preceptor experience of using competency tools 45 ; anxiety level of students during the assessment 28 ; assessment practices of nurse educators and managers 37 ; involvement of clinical nurses as mentors 35 ; mentors experiences when nursing students are on the borderline of achievement of competence in clinical practice. 42 Other areas included comparing nursing students' self-assessment and mentors' assessments on competency skills 33 ; and influence of assessors, 16 professional, legal and ethical nursing practice, leadership and nursing management and professional development.…”
Section: Clinical Competency Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…49 NTS that were assessed included: self-learning and critical thinking 44 ; interpersonal skills 22 ; ethical behavior 44 ; nurse-patient communication 36,44 ; risk prevention 44 ; nursing students' communication performance on advocacy, the therapeutic use of self and validation to patients and family 46 ; and ethical principles and professionalism. 31 The studies presenting the tools in Table 2 were mainly focused on the assessment of clinical competency skills 29 ; preceptor experience of using competency tools 45 ; anxiety level of students during the assessment 28 ; assessment practices of nurse educators and managers 37 ; involvement of clinical nurses as mentors 35 ; mentors experiences when nursing students are on the borderline of achievement of competence in clinical practice. 42 Other areas included comparing nursing students' self-assessment and mentors' assessments on competency skills 33 ; and influence of assessors, 16 professional, legal and ethical nursing practice, leadership and nursing management and professional development.…”
Section: Clinical Competency Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strengths and weaknesses were identified in the clinical competency assessment systems. The authors identified improved self-confidence 26 ; critical thinking 26 and good communication 34,43,46 ; collaboration and teamwork 43,46 ; effective remediation 35 ; quality nursing care 29 and monitoring students' progress 49 as strengths of assessment systems. Using different evaluation forms 44 ; incongruence between teaching and assessment 22 ; no module on patient safety in the curriculum 34 ; overwhelming clinical scenarios 39 ; and difficulty with face-to-face interaction 22 and lengthy assessment tool 49 were identified as weaknesses in clinical competency assessment.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Assessment Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, su satisfacción es elevada cuando reciben formación en materia de tutela 3. . Esta desconexión puede romper el continuum de aprendizaje, o provocar incoherencias entre contenidos teóricos y aprendizaje clínico 4 . Actualmente, existe literatura dirigida a los profesionales clínicos que tutelan estudiantes, pero pocos estudios abordan la integración teoría-práctica-clínica en los planes de estudios y los resultados de la evaluación de los estudiantes 5 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…La edad obtuvo una correlación inversa significativa con los ítems de la dimensión obstáculos "Me supone un obstáculo la carga adicional de trabajo" (ρ de Spearman =-235; p= 0,04) y "Me supone un obstáculo la responsabilidad que provoca" (ρ de Spearman =-221; p=0,023), siendo los más jóvenes quienes encontraban menos obstáculos en la tutela. Por último, el personal interino obtuvo mejores puntuaciones en el ítem de la dimensión compromiso "Creo que tutorizar estudiantes en prácticas es una función del profesional de enfermería" (Me=5; IQR=1; p=0,011), y el personal de atención primaria obtuvo mejores puntuaciones en el ítem "Tutelar estudiantes me ha fomentado una actitud activa hacia la formación" (Me=5; IQR=1; p=0,028).DISCUSIÓNLa evaluación de las prácticas clínicas es uno de los principales retos de la formación enfermera17 , y las enfermeras clínicas que tutelan estudiantes son responsables del 50% de la adquisición de competencias siendo pertinente conocer su nivel de participación4,6,18 .En primer lugar, tras la administración del cuestionario en el entorno de Castellón, los resultados obtenidos indican un nivel de implicación global aceptable, con una puntuación que representa el 74,44% de la puntuación máxima. La dimensión compromiso obtiene la mejor puntuación media, suponiendo el 86,94% de la máxima puntuación posible.…”
unclassified