Level of functional capacities following soccer-specific warm-up methods among elite collegiate soccer players

A, Vazini Taher; Parnow, Abdolhossein

doi:10.23736/s0022-4707.16.06236-8

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We observed no difference in the CMJ test, which aligns with a previous study comparing the 11+ with a dynamic warm-up. 30 Our findings do not align with Bizzini et al 18 reporting that the 11+ significantly reduces CMJ jump height. 18 One reason we observed a decline in sprint results, but not the CMJ, is that the hamstring muscles are much more important for sprinting than vertical jumping.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prepare to fail or failing to prepare? Acute performance after the 11+ with and without strength exercises

Støvland,

Amundsen,

Paulsen

et al. 2023

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe 11+ is an effective injury prevention warm-up programme but is often poorly adopted in practice. One reason for low compliance is the claim that the strength training part of the programme acutely impairs muscle performance before the football activity. This study aims to compare the acute effects of the 11+ with (WU+S) or without (WU-S) the strength training part on performance.MethodsFifteen female junior football players completed WU+S and WU-S on two separate days in randomised order. Maximal voluntary torque in knee extension and flexion (60°/s and 180°/s) and countermovement jump (CMJ) were tested before and after performing the warm-up protocol. Sprint performance and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were assessed post-warm-up.ResultsWarm-up with strength training reduced peak torque in knee flexion at 180°/s more than WU-S, while no differences were found at 60°/s. Knee extension work was reduced more with WU+S than WU-S at 180°/s, but no differences at 60°/s. Peak torque angle and CMJ were unaffected. Players were slower on 20 and 30 m sprints after WU+S than WU-S. The RPE was higher after WU+S than WU-S, but there were no differences in readiness to train between the two protocols.ConclusionPerforming the 11+ programme as a warm-up routine with the strength training part can impair subsequent knee flexion torque at high velocity and sprint performance in female junior football players compared with performing the 11+ warm-up without the strength part.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 92%

“…We observed no difference in the CMJ test, which aligns with a previous study comparing the 11+ with a dynamic warm-up 30. Our findings do not align with Bizzini et al 18 reporting that the 11+ significantly reduces CMJ jump height 18.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

Prepare to fail or failing to prepare? Acute performance after the 11+ with and without strength exercises

Støvland,

Amundsen,

Paulsen

et al. 2023

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, it is essential to use warm-up strategies that favor the performance of soccer players for such actions during matches. In the study conducted by Vazini Taher and Parnow (2017) on youth soccer players, an improvement of 2.8% was detected by dynamic stretching compared to static stretching in CMJ. In the study by Oliveira et al (2018) a trend of improvement in jump height measured through the squat jump in youth soccer players through warm-ups with stretching when compared to control condition was detected, being this improvement of 0.1% with ballistic stretching, 0.3% with dynamic stretching, 1.3% with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and 2.3% with static stretching.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…In a systematic review by Silva et al (2018) , it was observed that warm-up by dynamic stretching leads to improvements in sprints of 7.6%, 6.6% in agility and, 8.6% in vertical jump height in team sports. While in professional soccer players Vazini Taher and Parnow (2017) observed that static stretching led to a 2.8% decrease in jump height through countermovement jump (CMJ) compared to dynamic stretching in professional soccer players. Similarly, Vasileiou et al (2013) observed that dynamic stretching led to a statistically significant ( p < 0.05) improvement in 20 m maximal speed performance by 0.02%–0.06% decrease by static stretching in amateur soccer players.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Warm-up stretching exercises and physical performance of youth soccer players

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to compare the effects of standard warm-up versus warm-up using stretching exercises on the physical performance of male youth soccer players. Eighty-five male soccer players (age: 10.3 ± 4.3 years; body mass index: 19.8 ± 4.3 kg/m2) were assessed for countermovement jump height (CMJ, cm), 10 m, 20 m and 30 m running sprint speed (s) and ball kicking speed (km/h) for the dominant and non-dominant leg under five (randomized) warm-up conditions. Using 72 h of recovery between conditions, the participants completed a control condition (CC) and four experimental conditions, including static stretching (SSC), dynamic stretching (DSC), ballistic stretching (BSC), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNFC) exercises. All warm-up conditions had a duration of 10 minutes. The main results indicate that no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between warm-up conditions compared to CC in CMJ (CC = 28.1 ± 4.9; SSC = 28.4 ± 4.9; DSC = 30.9 ± 4.8; BSC = 30.9 ± 5.2; PNFC = 28.4 ± 5.0), 10 m sprint (CC = 2.42 ± 0.4; SSC = 2.50 ± 0.4; DSC = 2.30 ± 0.3; BSC = 2.27 ± 0.3; PNFC = 2.53 ± 0.4), 20 m sprint (CC = 5.42 ± 0.9; SSC = 5.59 ± 0.9; DSC = 5.37 ± 0.9; BSC = 5.40 ± 0.9; PNFC = 5.44 ± 0.9), 30 m sprint (CC = 8.05 ± 1.3; SSC = 8.27 ± 1.3; DSC = 8.01 ± 1.3; BSC = 8.00 ± 1.3; PNFC = 8.12 ± 1.3), ball kicking speed for dominant (CC = 56.2 ± 4.9; SSC = 55.3 ± 5.2; DSC = 56.9 ± 5.8; BSC = 57.3 ± 5.8; PNFC = 55.7 ± 5.2) and non-dominant leg (CC = 52.8 ± 3.4; SSC = 51.8 ± 4.6; DSC = 53.5 ± 5.4; BSC = 53.6 ± 4.9; PNFC = 52.5 ± 4.0). In conclusion, compared to standard warm-up, stretching-based warm-up exerts no effect on male youth soccer players jump height, sprint speed and ball kicking speed.

show abstract

“…More aspects than ROM must be taken into account because preparation for subsequent performance is a multifactorial paradigm. 115 Consequently, reaching the same flexibility goals with any alternative intervention challenges the established view on stretching and foam rolling; and, especially when the importance of time economics is taken into consideration, time-saving general warm-up routines (e.g., dynamic exercises 116 , 117 or cycling 26 , 88 ) may be preferred in practice.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foam rolling and stretching do not provide superior acute flexibility and stiffness improvements compared to any other warm-up intervention: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Warneke,

Plöschberger,

Lohmann

et al. 2024

Journal of Sport and Health Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Level of functional capacities following soccer-specific warm-up methods among elite collegiate soccer players

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Prepare to fail or failing to prepare? Acute performance after the 11+ with and without strength exercises

Prepare to fail or failing to prepare? Acute performance after the 11+ with and without strength exercises

Warm-up stretching exercises and physical performance of youth soccer players

Foam rolling and stretching do not provide superior acute flexibility and stiffness improvements compared to any other warm-up intervention: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About