1987
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89101987000500003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levantamento planorbídico do Estado de São Paulo (Brasil): 4ª Região Administrativa

Abstract: . Nas primeiras regiões trabalhadas que foram a sexta, a oitava, a nona e a décima, os funcionários de campo buscaram descobrir, pelo menos, um criadouro de moluscos em cada unidade de área. Posteriormente, para conferir maior precisão ao inquérito, foram instados a nelas descobrir dois ou mais ambientes de água doce que abrigassem caramujos.Junto às aglomerações urbanas, na periferia das cidades, em valas de horta e de irrigação,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
5

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding corroborates the literature data, which associate the presence of Lymnaeidae to environments with slow flow or stagnant water (Lima 1995, Hanley & Ultsch 1999. In a snail survey made in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, L. columella was more abundant in lentic environments (Vaz et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding corroborates the literature data, which associate the presence of Lymnaeidae to environments with slow flow or stagnant water (Lima 1995, Hanley & Ultsch 1999. In a snail survey made in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, L. columella was more abundant in lentic environments (Vaz et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Papers concerning surveys of freshwater snails in Brazil are still scarce in spite of the diversity of species and the importance of some of them to Public Health: Luz et al (1998), Morretes (1949), Paraense (1983), Paraense et al (1983), Vaz et al (1987), Souza et al (1998) and Thiengo et al (1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diplodon dunkerianus (Lea, 1856) and D. martensi (Ihering, 1893) were only presented by Simpson (1914) and Parodiz (1968), among the authors of Table 2. However, there are more recent references to D. martensi (Mansur 1970, Vaz et al 1987, Mansur 1999, Pfeifer & Pitoni 2003 and D. dunkerianus (Amaral et al 2008). Ortmann (1921) presented a similar number of species compared to later works (Haas 1969, Graf & Cummings 2007; however, the species listed were different.…”
Section: Taxonomy and Systematics Of Rhipidodontinimentioning
confidence: 99%