2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leukocytosis and neutrophilia predicts outcome in anal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
60
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
60
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a combined leukocyte-CEA score revealed that classified patients into three risk groups showed strong correlation with clinical outcome. Our data are in line to previous reports indicating an unfavorable role of peripheral blood leukocytosis and neutrophilia in the context of inflammation in different malignancies, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]21 including rectal cancer. 22,23 With regard to NLR, a pooled analysis of retrospective studies indicated a negative predictive impact in rectal cancer.…”
Section: <0001supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, a combined leukocyte-CEA score revealed that classified patients into three risk groups showed strong correlation with clinical outcome. Our data are in line to previous reports indicating an unfavorable role of peripheral blood leukocytosis and neutrophilia in the context of inflammation in different malignancies, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]21 including rectal cancer. 22,23 With regard to NLR, a pooled analysis of retrospective studies indicated a negative predictive impact in rectal cancer.…”
Section: <0001supporting
confidence: 93%
“…11 Although several groups have reported the unfavorable prognostic impact of peripheral blood leukocytosis and/or neutrophilia in patients with various malignancies, also in the context of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), these studies were limited by their retrospective nature, inhomogeneous treatment regimens and small patient numbers. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In the present secondary analysis, we examined the prognostic role of peripheral blood leukocytes and neutrophils together with other markers, including hemoglobin, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), in a large cohort of patients with rectal cancer (n = 1,236) treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase 3 randomized trial. 19 In that trial, the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU-based preoperative CRT resulted in a significant improvement of the primary endpoint, DFS, compared to the standard arm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory findings of patients were examined more than 2 times prior to treatment without any evidence of infection (Cho et al, ). TRL was defined as at least 2 separated occasions of leukocytosis exceeding number of white blood cell count>10,000/μl without any evidence of infection (Mabuchi et al, ; Schernberg, Escande, et al, ). The neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio was defined as the absolute neutrophil count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical characteristics of patients were reviewed, including age at diagnosis (>60 years old), sex, history of smoking (≥20 pack‐years), alcohol consumption (≥1 drink/day), Karnofsky performance status (≤80), Charlson's comorbidity index (Etienne et al, ), tumor site and extent and gross node and extranodal extension involvement, and postoperative treatment. The reference limits of baseline biomarkers in laboratory findings were defined from previous reports and our institutional normal ranges as TRL (white blood cell count > 10,000/μl; Mabuchi et al, ; Schernberg, Escande, et al, ), anemia (<11 g/dl in both genders) (Holgersson et al, ), hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dl; Park, Kim, et al, ; Park, Roh, et al, ), hypoproteinemia (<6.0 g/dl; Park, Roh, et al, ), neutrophilia (>7,500/μl; Schernberg, Escande, et al, ), lymphocytopenia (<1,000/μl; Schernberg, Moureau‐Zabotto, et al, ), monocytosis (>1,000/μl; Schernberg, Moureau‐Zabotto, et al, ), thrombophilia (>350 × 10 3 /μl; Holgersson et al, ; Schernberg, Moureau‐Zabotto, et al, ), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (>2.5) (Cho et al, ), platelet–lymphocyte ratio (>200) (Park, Roh, et al, ), and monocyte–lymphocyte ratio (>0.5) (Cho et al, ). Pathological factors of patients included tumor site (others/oral tongue) and extent, size (≤2/2.1–4/>4 cm) (Amin et al, ; Edge et al, ), invasion depth (≤5/5.1–10/>10 cm; Amin et al, ), differentiation (well/moderately/poorly), perineural and lymphovascular invasion (Geweiler, Inhestern, Berndt, & Guntinas‐Lichius, ), and resection margins (involved).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation