Letter by Plas et al Regarding Article, “Smoking-Thrombolysis Paradox: Recanalization and Reperfusion Rates After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Smokers With Ischemic Stroke”

Abstract

1 in which they investigated whether smoking is independently associated with recanalization and better functional outcome in patients treated with tissue-type plasminogen activator. They concluded that smokers had a better response to tissue-type plasminogen activator than nonsmokers. In the past decade, several studies have been published regarding this smoking-thrombolysis paradox.2-7 These studies reveal conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis of studies that investigated this smoking-thrombolysis paradox.We searched PubMed with combinations of the following terms: outcome, smoking, stroke, and thrombolysis. We selected only studies from which we could extract data for an unadjusted meta-analysis. On the basis of the abstracts, we included relevant studies. References of the included studies were searched to find relevant citation.We collected unadjusted data, such as current smokers, nonsmokers, and modified Rankin Scale scores at 3 months. Favorable functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Odds ratios were calculated using the MantelHaenszel method with fixed-effect models. The statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.2 (Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011).With our search strategy we found 27 studies, of which 9 were relevant. Three were excluded because data for smokers versus nonsmokers could not be extracted. In total, 7 studies were included, and of these, 4 were in favor of smoking.A total of 7494 patients were included, of whom 2156 (28.8%) were smokers. In total, 4184 patients (55.8%) had a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at 3 months, of which 31.7% were smokers. The overall unadjusted odds ratio was 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.53; P=0.02) in favor of smokers.This suggests that smoking is associated with a better functional outcome at 3 months in patients who received tissue-type plasminogen activator. This smoking-thrombolysis paradox also has been seen in patients with myocardial ischemia.This meta-analysis has some limitations. First, the analysis is unadjusted. In earlier studies, there was no better functional outcome in smokers after adjusting for possible confounders. Second, there is a heterogeneous group of data extracted from studies with different inclusion criteria with possible selection bias, various definitions of smoking, and data collection. Third, we split the patient group into current smokers versus nonsmokers. In the non-smokers group, ex-smokers were included because of records of pack-years smoking were not available in all articles. This is a heterogeneous group, unfortunately a specific analysis of pack-years and functional outcome was not possible.In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that smokers who receive tissue-type plasminogen activator with acute stroke had a better functional outcome versus nonsmokers. However, we agree with Kufner et al 1 that smoking is an important risk factor for stroke and that no stroke is always better than a recanalized stroke. DisclosuresNone.

The Smoking Paradox: Impact of Smoking on Recanalization in the Setting of Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis

“…The controversial data published according to prognosis [2,3,4,5,20] are likely to be related to difference in control of confounders. As previously reported, vascular risk factors are underrepresented in smokers compared to nonsmokers [2,4,5], and more importantly, current smokers are younger than non- or former smokers.…”

“…This phenomenon was first described in myocardial infarction (MI) [1] and has been further reported in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated by intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) [2,3]. A recent study reports that current smokers present higher recanalization rates within 24 h of symptom onset compared to nonsmokers [2].…”