2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-004-0829-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lethal and sublethal effects of imidacloprid on two earthworm species (Aporrectodea nocturna and Allolobophora icterica)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Asterisks indicate significant differences from the control (p \ 0.001) Changes in earthworm body mass (as a biomarker of effect) are thought to be of ecological relevance. It is often assumed that high losses in body mass may lead to negative effects on reproduction and survival (Capowiez et al 2005;Olvera-Velona et al 2008). We found body mass change to be significantly different from the control groups starting for concentrations of imidacloprid as low as 0.66 mg kg -1 dry soil for both species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Asterisks indicate significant differences from the control (p \ 0.001) Changes in earthworm body mass (as a biomarker of effect) are thought to be of ecological relevance. It is often assumed that high losses in body mass may lead to negative effects on reproduction and survival (Capowiez et al 2005;Olvera-Velona et al 2008). We found body mass change to be significantly different from the control groups starting for concentrations of imidacloprid as low as 0.66 mg kg -1 dry soil for both species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Soil water content was measured and adjusted to 20% (80% of the WHC) by adding distilled water thoroughly mixed and sieved again to 3 mm. Then soil spiking (for both, pesticide exposure groups and control groups) was conducted according to the protocol of Capowiez et al (2005) by adding 40 ml of water or solution containing the adapted pesticide concentration, reaching a final soil water content of 25% (of dry soil weight). The predicted environmental concentration (PEC) of imidacloprid was found to be in the range of 0.33-0.66 mg kg -1 dry soil depending on the country and crop under consideration (Oi 1999;Mostert et al 2000).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthworms play a major role in the soil ecosystem and are highly sensitive to contaminated soils (e.g., Schaefer 2003;Yeardley et al 1996), which makes them important ecological receptors and relevant test organisms in Ecotoxicology (Lavelle et al 2006;Römbke et al 2005); additionally, the burrowing activities of some species influence the properties and function of soils at different biological, chemical and physical scales (Capowiez et al 2005). In this way, earthworm avoidance behaviour has recently been considered as a promising endpoint in costeffective bioassays for screening soil contamination (Antunes et al 2008;da Luz et al 2004;Hund-Rinke and Wiechering 2001;Schaefer 2003;Slimak 1997;Yeardley et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, pesticides used at these rates did not show any effect at the individual level (Addison 1996;Bauer and Römbke 1997;Capowiez et al 2005;Choo and Baker 1998;Vermeulen et al 2001), or they only affected earthworm growth and reproduction (Choo and Baker 1998;Correia and Moreira 2010). For instance, the use of chlorpyrifos at agronomic rates may cause a delay in juvenile growth and a decrease in cocoon production of A. caliginosa (Alshawish et al 2004;Booth and O'Halloran 2001;Booth et al 2000b).…”
Section: Indicators and Effects At Individual And Population Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%