2015
DOI: 10.1177/1525822x15595343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Let’s Talk about Sex, Maybe

Abstract: Researchers are often skeptical of sexual behavior surveys: respondents may lie or forget details of their intimate lives, and interviewers may exercise authority in how they capture responses. We use data from a 2010–2011 cross-sectional sexual behavior survey in rural South Africa to explore who says what to whom about their sexual lives. Results show an effect of fieldworker age across outcomes -- respondents report “safer”, more “responsible” sexual behavior to older fieldworkers; and an effect of fieldwor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features may reduce social desirability bias [3], allowing us to get better information about older persons' partnership and potentially risky sexual behavior [7]. Nonetheless, the ability of the TRHC to reduce social desirability bias may be gendered, since it appears that women are no more likely to report partnerships, particularly those outside of marriage, than in surveys in similar contexts [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features may reduce social desirability bias [3], allowing us to get better information about older persons' partnership and potentially risky sexual behavior [7]. Nonetheless, the ability of the TRHC to reduce social desirability bias may be gendered, since it appears that women are no more likely to report partnerships, particularly those outside of marriage, than in surveys in similar contexts [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have limited variability on fieldworker effects, we modeled them as fixed effects. We selected our fieldworker age cut-offs to give variation for comparison, while not categorizing fieldworkers into unrealistic age categories; our cut-offs for “younger” and “older” fieldworkers takes into account that life expectancy in Agincourt is 55 years for males and 62 years for females (Kahn et al, 2012), and that the average age at first birth is 20 (Williams et al, 2013); and these age cut-offs were used previously in a similar study exploring fieldworker effects on sexual behavior reporting (Houle et al, 2016). While in this analysis we tested the effects of social categories of fieldworker age, we also tested models including differences in respondent and fieldworker age, finding most effects to be non-significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to explore social attribution effects by including interviewer characteristics, and to test whether these effects persist after allowing for correlation among respondents with the same interviewer. Based on a prior study exploring interviewer effects on sexual-behavior reporting in the same setting (see Houle et al, 2016), we hypothesize that respondents will report less substance use to older interviewers, and that male respondents will report higher substance use to male interviewers. The present inquiry is particularly important given the marked gender disparity in reported substance use in South Africa, and the potential interactions with social norms and desirability around associated risk behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 , 18 In South Africa, respondents reported more conservative sexual behavior (fewer lifetime sexual partners and more condom use) to older interviewers, and men were especially likely to report fewer lifetime sexual partners to male interviewers. 19 In Uganda, women were more likely to report sexual activity and willingness to use condoms to male interviewers compared with female interviewers. 20 In Malawi, adolescent girls were more likely to report having had sex when asked by a nurse before testing for sexually transmitted infections, compared with face-to-face interviews or ACASI.…”
Section: Collection Of Behavioral Datamentioning
confidence: 99%