‘Let’s take a look...’: An Investigation of Directives as Negotiating Interpersonal Meaning in Engineering Lectures

Abstract

The role of directives with command and question speech functions in teaching and learning contexts has received increased attention across a number of disciplines in recent years. This current study was aimed at investigating the use and function of directives with command and question speech functions as a dimension of interpersonal realization in aerospace engineering lectures at Delft University of Technology, Netherlands. Focusing on the English mood system, this study applied Halliday’s (1985, 1994) and Eggins’s (1994) Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) approach. A qualitative content analysis was carried out in four selected content lessons. The data were collected through videotaped recordings as found at cosmolearning.org. The findings showed that engineering lecturers employed various types of directives. In terms of commands, the lecturers used imperative, declarative, and modulated interrogative moods. In addition, lecturers used interrogative and declarative moods to pose questions. The lecturers used commands to express their attitudes, to organize their messages, to check students’ understanding, and to signal the contents of the exams. Meanwhile, in terms of questions, they function to elicit students’ background knowledge, to check on students’ comprehension, and to handle classroom management issues. The findings of this study can be used by English for Academic Purposes (EAP) professionals, in particular, language lecturers preparing students for the English for Medium Instruction (EMI) study. Also, stakeholders should use the findings of this study as a tool to improve English for English Special Purposes (ESP) teaching and learning in the context of the engineering classroom.

Phraseological Expressions: Gender-Based Corpus Analysis of EFL/ESL Academic Research Articles

“…Numerous research studies focused on probing the primary and advanced level functions of a target language through a large corpus within the academic sphere e.g. use of sentence connectors and conjunctions (Granger & Tyson, 1996;Kuswoyo et al, 2020) recurrent word combinations (Adel & Erman, 2012; Güngör & Uysal, 2016) novice and expert differences in the of lexical bundles (Zhang & Zhang, 2021) or simply academic writing as a genre in itself (Evison, 2013;Gray, 2011).…”

Transitivity Analysis of Presidential Debate Between Trump and Biden in 2020

“…Semantic can also be revealed. Additionally, SFL is concerned with the meaning that the speaker produced (Kuswoyo et al, 2021). These meaning includes interpersonal, textual, and ideational meaning.…”