Lessons learned from the AFLY5 RCT process evaluation: implications for the design of physical activity and nutrition interventions in schools

Abstract

BackgroundSystematic reviews have highlighted that school-based diet and physical activity (PA) interventions have had limited effects. This study used qualitative methods to examine how the effectiveness of future primary (elementary) school diet and PA interventions could be improved.MethodsData are from the Active For Life Year 5 (AFLY5) study, which was a cluster randomised trial conducted in 60 UK primary schools. Year 5 (8–9 years of age) pupils in the 30 intervention schools received a 12-month intervention. At the end of the intervention period, interviews were conducted with: 28 Year 5 teachers (including 8 teachers from control schools); 10 Headteachers (6 control); 31 parents (15 control). Focus groups were conducted with 70 year 5 pupils (34 control). Topics included how the AFLY5 intervention could have been improved and how school-based diet and PA interventions should optimally be delivered. All interviews and focus groups were transcribed and thematically analysed across participant groups.ResultsAnalysis yielded four themes.Child engagement: Data suggested that programme success is likely to be enhanced if children feel that they have a sense of autonomy over their own behaviour and if the activities are practical.School: Finding a project champion within the school would enhance intervention effectiveness. Embedding diet and physical activity content across the curriculum and encouraging teachers to role model good diet and physical activity behaviours were seen as important.Parents and community: Encouraging parents and community members into the school was deemed likely to enhance the connection between schools, families and communities, and “create a buzz” that was likely to enhance behaviour change.Government/Policy: Data suggested that there was a need to adequately resource health promotion activity in schools and to increase the infrastructure to facilitate diet and physical activity knowledge and practice.Discussion and ConclusionsFuture primary school diet and PA programmes should find ways to increase child engagement in the programme content, identify programme champions, encourage teachers to work as role models, engage parents and embed diet and PA behaviour change across the curriculum. However, this will require adequate funding and cost-effectiveness will need to be established.Trial registrationISRCTN50133740

Principals as Managers of Primary and Secondary Schools: State of the Art of Qualitative Research

“…Výzkumy se zaměřují i na některá dílčí témata. Několik výzkumů zkoumalo výsledky zavádění praktik, které měly za cíl zlepšit zdraví dětí ve školách (Gill, Chestnutt, & Channing, 2009;Gugglberger, Flaschberger, & Teutsch, 2017;Christian et al, 2015;Standage, Cumming, & Gillison, 2013;Storey et al, 2016); jiné výzkumy jsou zaměřeny na zlepšení stravovacích návyků (Jago et al, 2015;Moore, Murphy, Tapper, & Moore, 2010) nebo prevenci obezity u dětí (Howard-Drake & Halliday, 2016). Součástí života některých mladých studentů jsou drogy a alkohol, ředitelé k tomuto tématu zastávají určitá stanoviska, realizují konkrétní preventivní opatření a řeší vzniklé incidenty.…”

Implementation of a consumer-focused eHealth intervention for people with moderate-to-high cardiovascular disease risk: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation

“…Moreover, a process evaluation collects data about programme delivery, receipt and setting which are essential to understanding the social processes that influence why a complex intervention does or does not have its intended impact 3234 For this reason, process evaluations are increasingly reported in conjunction with RCT outcomes to explain impact and understand implications for future use of the intervention 35–38. Therefore, identifying how, for whom and in what contexts this type of intervention works will contribute new knowledge about the implementation of multicomponent, consumer-focussed eHealth interventions.…”

Trial baseline characteristics of a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school-located obesity prevention programme; the Healthy Lifestyles Programme (HeLP) trial

“…The authors concluded that future interventions need to be more intensive and embed diet and physical activity behaviour change across the curriculum. In addition, interventions should aim to increase knowledge, motivation and skills of the children involved, find ways to increase child engagement in programme content and, crucially, engage parents [16]. Based on the lessons learnt from previous school-based interventions, we developed the Healthy Lifestyles Programme; a school-based obesity prevention intervention.…”