2017
DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2017.1295124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons Learned for Successful Dissertation Completion From Social Work Doctoral Graduates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Students must learn to identify problems, find solutions and defend their methodological decisions (Caicedo-Delgado, 2018; Onieva Lopez, 2016). Consulting experts and taking advantage of resources on their programs is also valuable (Lim et al ., 2019; Massyn, 2018; Davis et al ., 2017; Kumar and Coe, 2017; Marshall et al ., 2017; Lindsay, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students must learn to identify problems, find solutions and defend their methodological decisions (Caicedo-Delgado, 2018; Onieva Lopez, 2016). Consulting experts and taking advantage of resources on their programs is also valuable (Lim et al ., 2019; Massyn, 2018; Davis et al ., 2017; Kumar and Coe, 2017; Marshall et al ., 2017; Lindsay, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matsushita (2018) suggested that active learning is about driving learners to act and to reflect on learning through action. Graduate students are expected to develop independent research knowledge, skills, and experiences before writing their theses (Davis et al, 2017). Active learning emphasizes learners' deep learning, understanding, and engagement in the learning process (Matsushita, 2018), and active learning expects learners to think, analyze, discuss, and make decisions with their peers as part of an active learning process (Freeman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Achievement Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors hindering doctoral program success include the inability to be self-directed (Ponton, 2014), lack of a sense of community between students (Rovai, 2014) and between students and faculty (Terosky & Heasley, 2015), poor mentorship and feedback (Terrell, Snyder, & Dringus, 2012), low feelings of student-to-student and student-to-faculty connectedness (Terrell et al, 2009), isolation from peers (Ali & Kohun, 2006;Delamont, Atkinson, & Parry, 1997;Lewis, Ginsberg, Davies, & Smith, 2004), students feeling like they do not fit into the department-level structure and culture (Golde, 2005), students feeling financially stressed (Wao & Onwuegbuzie, 2011;Earl-Novell, 2006;Lovitts, 2001), and low levels of support from friends and family (Volkert et al, 2018;Cohen, 2011). Similarly, factors fostering doctoral student success include a sense of belonging (Barnett, 2014), participation in a community of practice with doctoral peers (Ivankova & Stick, 2005;Terrell et al, 2012;Tweedie, Clark, Johnson, & Kay, 2013), consistent, timely, and substantive feedback from the dissertation chair (Rademaker, Duffy, Wetzler, & Zaikina-Montgomery, 2016;Rockinson-Szapkiw, et al, 2016;Davis, Wladkowski, & Mirick, 2017), students having expectations about the program, coursework, and policies that match those of the program (Hoskins & Goldberg, 2005), support services (Rockinson-Szapkiw, et al, 2016), and family support (Pauley, Cunningham, & Toth 1999;Rockinson-Szapkiw et al, 2016;E. G. Smith & Delmor, 2007;Volkert et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%