2017
DOI: 10.5964/jspp.v5i2.736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons from the past for the future: The definition and mobilisation of Hindu nationhood by the Hindu nationalist movement of India

Abstract: Guided by a self-categorisation and social-identity framework of identity entrepreneurship (Reicher & Hopkins, 2001), and social representations theory of history (Liu & Hilton, 2005), this paper examines how the Hindu nationalist movement of India defines Hindu nationhood by embedding it in an essentialising historical narrative. The heart of the paper consists of a thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) of the ideological manifestos of the Hindu nationalist movement in India, "Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?" (1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because historical narratives tend to be embedded within the strategies that 'entrepreneurs of identity' (Reicher & Hopkins, 2001) use in the construction and mobilization of identity projects -demarcating the 'essence' of a group's identity and intergroup relations through a historical lens (see Khan, Svensson, Jogdand, & Liu, 2016;Liu & Khan, 2014;). From this perspective, identity comes to be communicated and understood through the lens of social representations of history.…”
Section: National Identification Support For Reparations and Assignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because historical narratives tend to be embedded within the strategies that 'entrepreneurs of identity' (Reicher & Hopkins, 2001) use in the construction and mobilization of identity projects -demarcating the 'essence' of a group's identity and intergroup relations through a historical lens (see Khan, Svensson, Jogdand, & Liu, 2016;Liu & Khan, 2014;). From this perspective, identity comes to be communicated and understood through the lens of social representations of history.…”
Section: National Identification Support For Reparations and Assignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So despite rising inequality, political preferences of many in high‐income countries support a protectionist agenda that results in further rises in inequality and a decline in real incomes. Inequality of course has had important political consequences in non‐Western settings (Khan, Svensson, Jogdand, & Liu, ); invariably though particular political responses to inequality will be bound by the culture in which it is found. In the West at least, FR populism appears to be linked to a cultural backlash associated with conformity to traditional values, protectionism, and rejection of multiculturalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of national identity in the field of psychology resonates with the notion of imagined communities. The social identity approach examines the phenomenon at two levels of analysis: (1) the representation, contestation, and mobilization of nationalism and national identity by identity entrepreneurs (e.g., Khan et al, 2017;Reicher & Hopkins, 2001); and (2) the nature, strength, and implications of subjective identification with the nation (e.g., Blank & Schmidt, 2003;Fleischmann & Phalet, 2018;Huddy & Khatib, 2007;Kanas & Martinovic, 2017;Mummendey, Klink, & Brown, 2001;Pehrson, Brown, & Zagefka, 2009;Pehrson, Vignoles, & Brown, 2009;Verkuyten, 2009); that is, the approach accounts for both political and individual imaginings of the nation. The focus of the present study is at the second level of analysis in that it operationalizes national identification as the strength by which individuals identify with the nation, devoid of ideological connotations; it arguably represents cognitive attachment to the nation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%