2021
DOI: 10.1111/fare.12575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons From the Field: Developing a Multisite Divorce Education Evaluation Tool

Abstract: In this Lessons from the Field, we describe the lessons we learned from developing the Divorce Education Assessment Collaborative (DEAC) and creating a longitudinal evaluation plan for divorce education programs across geographically, programmatically, and format-diverse programs. Background: Although divorce education programs are commonly mandated for divorcing parents, variability in program content, format, and design can make it difficult to determine the efficacy of such programs. We contend developing a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was apparent in the I Help Myself type of parents identified by Beckmeyer and Russell (2024) and has also been raised as issues in our own emerging multi‐program work (Markham et al, 2023), and in prior qualitative research (Markham & Coleman, 2012). Parents who view their former partners as either unable or unwilling to coparent see this as a barrier to implementing the information or skills learned in parent education programs (Markham et al, 2023). Parent educators could suggest and teach parallel parenting as an intentional strategy for families (Puhlman et al, 2023) as an alternative to cooperative coparenting in these situations and others (e.g., IPV, high conflict).…”
Section: Recommendations For Parenting Education Program Contentmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was apparent in the I Help Myself type of parents identified by Beckmeyer and Russell (2024) and has also been raised as issues in our own emerging multi‐program work (Markham et al, 2023), and in prior qualitative research (Markham & Coleman, 2012). Parents who view their former partners as either unable or unwilling to coparent see this as a barrier to implementing the information or skills learned in parent education programs (Markham et al, 2023). Parent educators could suggest and teach parallel parenting as an intentional strategy for families (Puhlman et al, 2023) as an alternative to cooperative coparenting in these situations and others (e.g., IPV, high conflict).…”
Section: Recommendations For Parenting Education Program Contentmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Scholars have also called for parent educators to partner with other programs to effectively provide referrals for parents who need additional services (e.g., mental health, IPV, substance use; Beckmeyer & Russell, 2024; Markham et al, 2023; Schramm & Becher, 2020). Beckmeyer and Russell (2024) provide ideas for additional collaborations, including opportunities for divorce educators, family lawyers, and family courts to work together to develop accurate informational resources to provide families additional guidance on navigating legal systems, such as custody arrangements, child support, and the legal divorce process.…”
Section: Recommendations For Parenting Education To Better Meet Famil...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bridging Parental Conflict was developed by two licensed marriage and family therapists in the state of Minnesota, and is offered as an online divorce education program that is designed for parents who are engaged in conflict with their former partners to help them manage themselves in the conflict and lessen the stress their children feel in All three programs were evaluated using a standardized evaluation tool and process (see Markham et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from all programs utilized a consistent evaluation tool developed by the Divorce Education Assessment Collaborative (see Markham et al, 2021), an expert group of researchers and educators that consulted with a larger advisory board of key stakeholders in the development and implementation of divorce education programming. Items were selected for inclusion in the evaluation tool based upon a comprehensive review of literature, including systematic reviews of both core content areas for divorce education programming (Schramm et al, 2018) and available assessment tools (Guyette et al, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, in part, due to the many barriers to systematic evaluation of programs in community settings, including adequate training in program evaluation, funding, and access to appropriate assessment tools. Notably, there is an ongoing recent initiative to develop a standardized divorce education evaluation tool as an initial step toward understanding the effects of programs across jurisdictions (Markham et al, 2021).…”
Section: Educational/didacticmentioning
confidence: 99%