2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Less rigid stable fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone using locked plates with near cortical slots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
52
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinically, distal femoral fractures stabilized with far cortical locking constructs healed at a mean time of sixteen weeks with a 3% nonunion rate 18 . Far cortical locking has been implemented in commercial implants 7,[19][20][21][22] and has been simulated using standard locking screws by means of overdrilling 14 or slotting 23 of the near cortex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, distal femoral fractures stabilized with far cortical locking constructs healed at a mean time of sixteen weeks with a 3% nonunion rate 18 . Far cortical locking has been implemented in commercial implants 7,[19][20][21][22] and has been simulated using standard locking screws by means of overdrilling 14 or slotting 23 of the near cortex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several angular stable locking devices, such as anatomical pre-shaped plates and intramedullary nails have a relative high stiffness [9,10,31] compared to the humeral head; implant stiffness has been proposed as an important factor to achieve adequate fracture fixation [32]. In contrast, in patients with reduced bone mass, a large mismatch between the stiffness of the implant and the osteoporotic bone may lead to ''stress riser'' followed by screw cut out or fracture at the end of the plate [19,33,34]. Furthermore, too stiff fixation may reduce micromotion at the fracture site below the threshold required for callus formation leading to a potential nonunion [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in patients with reduced bone mass, a large mismatch between the stiffness of the implant and the osteoporotic bone may lead to ''stress riser'' followed by screw cut out or fracture at the end of the plate [19,33,34]. Furthermore, too stiff fixation may reduce micromotion at the fracture site below the threshold required for callus formation leading to a potential nonunion [19]. In contrast, too elastic implants may not be able to hold reduction, and some biomechanical studies have shown that high elasticity may lead to early failure [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, studies, with and without the use of locking plates, have demonstrated good to excellent outcomes of operative treatments of ankle fractures in the elderly individuals. 12,[15][16][17][18]25,26 Additionally, in studies comparing operative versus nonoperative techniques, better outcomes using surgery have also been demonstrated due to the ability of the implant to maintain the reduction until healing has occurred. 13,14,[19][20][21]29,33,35,38 Since locked plates have shown an improvement in the fixation of osteopenic and osteoporotic bone, they should be used.…”
Section: Ankle Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%