1982
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.144.4.7111717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesions missed on small-bowel follow-through: analysis and recommendations.

Abstract: Forty-two surgically confirmed small-bowel lesions that were not detected by small-bowel follow-through but were demonstrated by enteroclysis were analyzed to determine why small-bowel follow-through had failed to detect them. Thirty lesions (71%) were not seen in retrospect; this was attributed to technical inadequacies. Twelve lesions (29%) were seen in retrospect. Of these, two (17%) of the lesions had been missed originally because of perceptive errors, seven (58%) because of combined perceptive and techni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0
4

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak prevalence of obstruction, adhesions, and miscellaneous lesions was in patients between 51 and 70 years, whereas the highest prevalence of Crohn's disease was in patients under 30 years. Positive results also depended on the technique used [5,7]. The positive rate of peroral small bowel examination was 29% (119 of 417 patients) compared to 48% (53 of 111 patients) for enteroclysis (p < 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak prevalence of obstruction, adhesions, and miscellaneous lesions was in patients between 51 and 70 years, whereas the highest prevalence of Crohn's disease was in patients under 30 years. Positive results also depended on the technique used [5,7]. The positive rate of peroral small bowel examination was 29% (119 of 417 patients) compared to 48% (53 of 111 patients) for enteroclysis (p < 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La CE es una modalidad nueva de explorar el intestino delgado, su principal ventaja es la capacidad de visualizar la mucosa con mínimos riesgos para el paciente, y en comparación con el estudio radiológico de intestino delgado, tiene una mayor capacidad de detectar lesiones planas como las angiodisplasias 30 . Las complicaciones descritas para el procedimiento son bajas 31 , la más importante aunque infrecuente es la retención [32][33][34][35] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…This is the technique used at our institution. An optimal examination entails administration of a gastric-emptying agent [22], an adequate contrast volume with top up if transit is slow, and careful fluoroscopy and compression of loops [23]. The examination may also be modified by a peroral pneumocolon [24,25] and administration of effervescent tablets [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%