Following renal transplantation, patients are often evaluated with ultrasonography (US) or radionuclide imaging to assess renal function and the presence of possible complications. Both modalities are inexpensive, noninvasive, and nonnephrotoxic. A basic understanding of the surgical techniques commonly used for renal transplantation is useful when imaging these patients in order to recognize complications and to direct further imaging or intervention. The most frequent complications of renal transplantation include perinephric fluid collections; decreased renal function; and abnormalities of the vasculature, collecting system, and renal parenchyma. Perinephric fluid collections are common following transplantation, and their clinical significance depends on the type, location, size, and growth of the fluid collection, features that are well-evaluated with US. Causes of diminished renal function include acute tubular necrosis, rejection, and toxicity from medications. Radionuclide imaging is the most useful modality for assessing renal function. Vascular complications of transplantation include occlusion or stenosis of the arterial or venous supply, arteriovenous fistulas, and pseudoaneurysms. Although the standard for evaluating these vascular complications is angiography, US is an excellent noninvasive method for screening. Other transplant complications such as abnormalities of the collecting system and renal parenchyma are well-evaluated with both radionuclide imaging and US.

Imaging of the gallbladder for cholelithiasis and its complications has changed dramatically in recent decades along with expansion of interventional techniques related to the disease. Ultrasonography (US) is the method of choice for detection of gallstones. The characteristic US findings of gallstones are a highly reflective echo from the anterior surface of the gallstone, mobility of the gallstone on repositioning the patient, and marked posterior acoustic shadowing. Oral cholecystography remains an excellent method of gallstone detection, but its role has been limited due to the advantages of US. Most people with cholelithiasis will not experience symptoms or complications related to gallstones. When biliary colic does occur, it is typically caused by transient obstruction of the cystic duct by a stone. The primary imaging modality in suspected acute calculous cholecystitis is usually US or cholescintigraphy. Detection of gallstones alone does not permit a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis; however, secondary US findings provide more specific information. In detection of choledocholithiasis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are superior to US. In certain clinical settings, interventional radiologic procedures have become an important alternative to surgery in the treatment of gallstones and their complications; techniques include percutaneous cholecystostomy and gallstone removal.

While there are many potential benefits of structuring radiology reports, such changes cannot be assumed to improve report accuracy or completeness. Any SRS should be tested for effect on intrinsic report quality.

No abstract

Hepatic metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors that respond to treatment with STI-571 can appear as near-cystic components with well-defined borders on contrast-enhanced CT. Most metastases became smaller. These metastases resemble simple cysts, but density measurements may differentiate them from one another.

No abstract

Sonohysterography is a simple ultrasound (US) procedure that may be used to evaluate the endometrium. The technique involves placement of a 5-F catheter into the endometrial canal with subsequent instillation of sterile saline solution under US guidance. Fifty patients successfully underwent sonohysterography because of apparent abnormal endometrial thickening at transvaginal US, a nonspecific finding. Patients tolerated this procedure well, and no complications were encountered. In the 39 patients who proved to have endometrial pathologic conditions, sonohysterography demonstrated focal processes (polyps, carcinoma, hamartoma) in 15, diffuse processes (hyperplasia, secretory endometrium) in 21, and both focal and diffuse pathologic conditions in three. If a focal process can be delineated, a visually directed biopsy may be necessary. However, if the process is diffuse, a blind aspiration biopsy may be performed on an outpatient basis. In the majority of patients, the diffuse or focal nature of the disease could not be predicted on the basis of initial transvaginal US. Because sonohysterography allows distinction between diffuse and focal abnormalities, it provides physicians with a cost-effective way to plan the next step in case management.

No abstract