2017
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesion-Specific Ischemia With Noninvasive Computed Tomographic Angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CTP requires a high-end scanner, ideally with single heartbeat coverage and dedicated personnel, protocols, and postprocessing. CT-FFR can be obtained from CTA data from any scanner, but the images must be of high quality, the results are not available immediately, and there is an additional cost for using off-site CT-FFR technology [142]. Onsite systems are not commercially available as yet.…”
Section: Which Ct Imaging Technique Is Best For Ischemia?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTP requires a high-end scanner, ideally with single heartbeat coverage and dedicated personnel, protocols, and postprocessing. CT-FFR can be obtained from CTA data from any scanner, but the images must be of high quality, the results are not available immediately, and there is an additional cost for using off-site CT-FFR technology [142]. Onsite systems are not commercially available as yet.…”
Section: Which Ct Imaging Technique Is Best For Ischemia?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this review retains the important caveat of a lack of the individualized patient data provided by original study investigators, the authors were able to perform analyses assessing the accuracy of CT-FFR across a range of FFR values. As discussed by Shaw and Nicol, CT-FFR performed best at the outer ranges of FFR values rather than within the intermediate range of 0.7 to 0.8. Whether avoiding (or performing) angiography in patients with CT-FFR values within this range is safe/effective can only be determined through larger prospective studies that assess the clinical outcomes of these approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…CAD의 혈역학적 분석 기법인 CT-FFR와 CTP 중에 선택은 가용 자원과 인력에 크게 영향을 받는다( Table 5 ). CT-FFR은 대부분의 심장 CT에서 얻는 CCTA를 이용해 측정할 수 있지만, 화질이 좋아야 하며, 원격 CT-FFR을 사용하는 경우, 결과를 얻기까지 시간과 상당한 추가 비용이 발생한다( 132 ). 현장 CT-FFR은 반자동 시스템으로 특히 석회화가 심한 병변을 대상으로 수기 교정이 필요하다.…”
Section: 기능적 분석 기법의 비교와 선택unclassified