Les zones de fragilité orthographique dans les productions sous dictée contrainte d’un texte classique par des adultes diplômé·e·s

Pérez, Manuel; Garcia-Debanc, Claudine

doi:10.1051/shsconf/20162707013

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Godin et al (2018) repeated this same exercise among students with or without developmental language disorder (DLD) in Grade 2 of elementary school. Pérez (2016) studied spelling fragility areas in French spelling with future school teachers, while Katoozian (2013) and Masseron and Luste-Chaa (2008) studied errors in the context of French as a foreign language. In our study, we specifically targeted beginning writers in Grade 1.…”

Section: Learning Lexical Spellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Planning and Assessing Word Production to Support Lexical Spelling Learning in Grade 1

Lavoie,

Marin

2023

icmetl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Learning to spell is a major challenge for beginning writers because they have to develop a great deal of knowledge. Teachers are faced with a challenge as well in that they have to plan the words to be studied and assess the skill level of their students by analyzing the words they produce. The objectives of this study were to measure the lexical spelling success rate of French-speaking Québec students in grade 1 (6-7 years old) in certain spelling fragility areas, to describe the spelling variations that appeared and to discuss the relevance of planning and assessing word production. The research was conducted with 172 students (82 girls and 90 boys) from nine classes in one public urban elementary school. They were administered a dictation exercise using words selected with various criteria. The analysis was conducted on a corpus of 2076 words produced. The researchers then calculated the spelling success rate and the percentage of errors, in addition to doing a fine-grained analysis of the phonographic, orthographic and morphographic productions and the types of errors made (omission, substitution, addition and displacement). The results highlighted changes under way. They also showed that the success rate varies according to the spelling fragility areas being targeted and, surprisingly, that the rate fluctuates for the same fragility areas. The dictation used seems to be an “economical” tool for various reasons, among others because it is easy to administer (requires little time) and the spelling success rate is easy to determine.

show abstract

Section: Learning Lexical Spellingmentioning

confidence: 99%