2019
DOI: 10.3917/resg.127.0161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les entreprises familiales apprennent-elles différemment ? Effets des attributs ambivalents de l’entreprise familiale sur les apprentissages des individus et de l’organisation

Abstract: Le peu de travaux qui s’intéresse à l’apprentissage organisationnel dans les entreprises familiales l’aborde sous un angle particulier, le plus souvent en relation avec un autre concept, sans jamais s’intéresser au phénomène en tant que tel. Dans cet article, nous porterons une attention particulière à l’apprentissage organisationnel dans les entreprises familiales. Notre travail a pour objectifs d’analyser les éléments de contexte qui tendent à influencer les conditions d’apprentissage organisationnel dans ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conceptual model is composed of concepts and constructs drawn from previous research. It is broken down into three levels Level I, referred to as governance corresponds to the different concepts that concretize the agency relationships between family, owners and managers: delegation of power, management systems, family council, board of directors, board of management, mode of professional relationship, training plan and risk taking (Allouche & Amann, 2002;Ampenberger, Schmid, Achleitner, & Kaserer, 2013;Arrègle & Mari, 2010;Bauweraerts & Colot, 2013;Bentebbaa, Pacitto, Louitri, & Abdoune, 2018;Chrisman, Chua, De Massis, Minola, & Vismara, 2016;Gallo, Tàpies, & Cappuyns, 2004;Michiels & Molly, 2017;Sharma, Chrisman, & Gersick, 2012). Level II, called family, consists of eight constructs namely: the percentage of capital held, the professional relationships of the leader, the level of education of the employees, the level of education of the leader, the age of the leader, the professional experience, the family conflicts and the recruitment procedures (Amann, Berger, Gattaz, & Monassier, 2011;Steier, Chrisman, & Chua, 2015); in a third, altruism on the work of Barney (2014) and Louis and Filion (2011).…”
Section: The Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual model is composed of concepts and constructs drawn from previous research. It is broken down into three levels Level I, referred to as governance corresponds to the different concepts that concretize the agency relationships between family, owners and managers: delegation of power, management systems, family council, board of directors, board of management, mode of professional relationship, training plan and risk taking (Allouche & Amann, 2002;Ampenberger, Schmid, Achleitner, & Kaserer, 2013;Arrègle & Mari, 2010;Bauweraerts & Colot, 2013;Bentebbaa, Pacitto, Louitri, & Abdoune, 2018;Chrisman, Chua, De Massis, Minola, & Vismara, 2016;Gallo, Tàpies, & Cappuyns, 2004;Michiels & Molly, 2017;Sharma, Chrisman, & Gersick, 2012). Level II, called family, consists of eight constructs namely: the percentage of capital held, the professional relationships of the leader, the level of education of the employees, the level of education of the leader, the age of the leader, the professional experience, the family conflicts and the recruitment procedures (Amann, Berger, Gattaz, & Monassier, 2011;Steier, Chrisman, & Chua, 2015); in a third, altruism on the work of Barney (2014) and Louis and Filion (2011).…”
Section: The Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%