2013
DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.028.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les défis de l’évaluation développementale en recherche : une analyse d’implantation d’un projet «hôpital promoteur de santé»

Abstract: Developmental evaluation (DE), an approach developed by Patton to support the implementation of innovations, remains relatively untested in research. This article describes an attempt to apply DE as part of an implementation study of a health-promoting hospital project in a university hospital. The article highlights the dichotomous demands of academic research and evaluation use inherent in applying DE from a research perspective, and analyzes the challenges encountered in this case. The conclusion is that DE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The establishment of this TEC was meant to facilitate inclusive and collaborative process 1,18,19 and encourage future use of the results, [20][21][22][23][24] in a dynamic and complex environment 25 by facilitating reflection and decision-making. [25][26][27] This study was conducted in three phases (Table 1) and one of the important actions was the real-time feedback, which allowed for rapid feedback to participants, TEC and other stakeholders in a timely manner and in an appropriate format. 20,26,28…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment of this TEC was meant to facilitate inclusive and collaborative process 1,18,19 and encourage future use of the results, [20][21][22][23][24] in a dynamic and complex environment 25 by facilitating reflection and decision-making. [25][26][27] This study was conducted in three phases (Table 1) and one of the important actions was the real-time feedback, which allowed for rapid feedback to participants, TEC and other stakeholders in a timely manner and in an appropriate format. 20,26,28…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%