2007
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leptin levels in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ascites

Abstract: AIM:To evaluate the role of leptin levels in the differential diagnosis of ascites. METHODS:Ascitic leptin, TNFα and serum leptin levels were measured in 77 patients with ascites (35 with malignancies, 30 cirrhosis and 12 tuberculosis). Control serum samples were obtained from 20 healthy subjects. Leptin and TNFα levels were measured by ELISA. Body mass index (BMI) and percentage of body fat (BFM) by skin fold measurement were calculated for all patients and control groups. Peritoneal biopsy, ascites cytology … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the difference in the male‐to‐female ratio between tuberculosis and non‐tuberculous benign lesions was not significant ( P = 0.42756). A similar trend was observed when the various studies from the review of the literature were taken into consideration (Table ); the malignancy patients (male : female = 730:649 with females accounting for 47.1%) were significantly different from tuberculosis patients (male : female = 656: 342 with females accounting for 35.7%, P = 0.00000) as well as non‐tuberculous benign cases (male : female = 232:129, P = 0.00014). However, the difference between tuberculosis and non‐tuberculous benign lesions was not significant ( P = 0.65151).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the difference in the male‐to‐female ratio between tuberculosis and non‐tuberculous benign lesions was not significant ( P = 0.42756). A similar trend was observed when the various studies from the review of the literature were taken into consideration (Table ); the malignancy patients (male : female = 730:649 with females accounting for 47.1%) were significantly different from tuberculosis patients (male : female = 656: 342 with females accounting for 35.7%, P = 0.00000) as well as non‐tuberculous benign cases (male : female = 232:129, P = 0.00014). However, the difference between tuberculosis and non‐tuberculous benign lesions was not significant ( P = 0.65151).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Whereas tuberculous serous effusion was mostly a disease of those aged <40 years, malignant effusion was a commonly found in the ≥50 years age group. A review of the literature (Table ) shed light on age and sex distribution in 13 studies that were based on pleural effusion and ascitic fluids involved by malignancy and tuberculous processes and six studies in which malignancy, tuberculosis and non‐tuberculous benign lesions presented with serous effusions . In all these 19 studies, the mean and/or median age of malignancy patients were ≥50 years, as opposed to tuberculous pleurisy cases in which the mean/median age was ≥50 years in just eight patients ( P = 0.00006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these articles, 31 were excluded based on the titles and key words; the full text of 36 was obtained and another 24 papers were eliminated after reviewing the abstract and full text. Eventually, 12 studies met our inclusion criteria were enrolled in this meta-analysis (5,18,(20)(21)(22)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). These 12 case-control studies included 332 PTB patients and 292 healthy controls.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%