2002
DOI: 10.1002/wea.6080570303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lenticular wave cloud above the convective boundary layer of the Rocky Mountains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the nearby radiosonde at 1200 utc showed a layer of low wind speed at a height of 900m, which would be a critical layer in terms of absorbing mountain waves (Worthington and Thomas, ). To explain the contradiction, Sinha suggested that friction and thermals from the windward bare rocky mountain slopes would increase the effective height of the mountain to ≈1km (Worthington, ).…”
Section: Post‐war Scorer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the nearby radiosonde at 1200 utc showed a layer of low wind speed at a height of 900m, which would be a critical layer in terms of absorbing mountain waves (Worthington and Thomas, ). To explain the contradiction, Sinha suggested that friction and thermals from the windward bare rocky mountain slopes would increase the effective height of the mountain to ≈1km (Worthington, ).…”
Section: Post‐war Scorer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%