2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-014-0331-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary-layer effects on mountain waves: a new look at some historical studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (a), airflow is laminar down to the mountain surface (dark grey; Scorer, ). In (b), the lower part of the turbulent boundary layer acts as an effective mountain higher than the actual mountain (Worthington, , , ). In both (a) and (b), only the laminar flow in the upper boundary layer is revealed by well‐known lenticular mountain‐wave clouds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (a), airflow is laminar down to the mountain surface (dark grey; Scorer, ). In (b), the lower part of the turbulent boundary layer acts as an effective mountain higher than the actual mountain (Worthington, , , ). In both (a) and (b), only the laminar flow in the upper boundary layer is revealed by well‐known lenticular mountain‐wave clouds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mountain waves also occur above convective rolls present above mountains (Bradbury, ), being launched by a process similar to convection waves, where the mountain waves modulate the strength of convection (Hosler et al ., ; Orville, ; Tang et al ., ) and the convection partly forces the waves (Worthington, , ). Worthington () suggests there are two types of mountain wave: classic ‘type 1’ mountain waves are forced directly by high ridge‐like mountains; ‘type 2’ are forced indirectly, for example above convection, rotors and turbulence in the lower boundary layer, with the flow only becoming mostly wave‐like above a mountain‐wave launching height (Shutts, ). Type 1 and 2 waves are different from the type 1 and 2 rotors described by Hertenstein and Kuettner ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%