2018
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lens Dose Reduction by Patient Posture Modification During Neck CT

Abstract: Combining head tilt and scanning range reduction is an easy and effective method that significantly reduces radiation dose to the lens and other radiosensitive head and neck organs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…or implantable electric devices (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter–defibrillator, etc.) are near the scan range, operators should pay particular attention to the scan parameters . Mosher et al objectively evaluated the exposure dose of neck CT by using a computer simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…or implantable electric devices (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter–defibrillator, etc.) are near the scan range, operators should pay particular attention to the scan parameters . Mosher et al objectively evaluated the exposure dose of neck CT by using a computer simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are near the scan range, operators should pay particular attention to the scan parameters . Mosher et al objectively evaluated the exposure dose of neck CT by using a computer simulation. We aimed to reduce the exposure dose of radiosensitive organs by changing the position of the neck and scan parameters in neck CT, and the results showed that the overranging greatly influenced the eye‐lens dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even gantry tilting and patient set-up seem to significantly affect eye lens dose [9]. Such simple measures, such as modifying the neck position, shortening the scanning range and reducing the tube potential could decrease the dose to the lens by 89% [11].…”
Section: Ophthalmic Effects In Irradiated Children and Individuals Exmentioning
confidence: 99%