2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203505052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lenition and Contrast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now the question arises as to why lenited and non-lenited allophones may survive in such a contextually determined, albeit variable and apparently unstable, situation. As found by Gurevich’s language survey this finding is consistent with lenition processes being overwhelmingly meaning-maintaining (they result in free variation or allophonic distribution but not in phonological neutralization), as it occurs precisely in Spanish or Catalan where [β, ð, ɣ] cannot be confused with other existing sounds (Gurevich, 2004). This appears to be in line with listeners being largely insensitive to the phonetic difference between voiced stop and approximant realizations of /b, d, g/, and definitely less sensitive to this manner distinction than to the contrast between voiced and voiceless stops (Kaplan, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now the question arises as to why lenited and non-lenited allophones may survive in such a contextually determined, albeit variable and apparently unstable, situation. As found by Gurevich’s language survey this finding is consistent with lenition processes being overwhelmingly meaning-maintaining (they result in free variation or allophonic distribution but not in phonological neutralization), as it occurs precisely in Spanish or Catalan where [β, ð, ɣ] cannot be confused with other existing sounds (Gurevich, 2004). This appears to be in line with listeners being largely insensitive to the phonetic difference between voiced stop and approximant realizations of /b, d, g/, and definitely less sensitive to this manner distinction than to the contrast between voiced and voiceless stops (Kaplan, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Indeed, the lenition scale has been reported to be /g/ > /d/ > /b/ in Florentine Italian and Balearic Catalan (Villafaña Dalcher, 2006; Wheeler, 2005, p. 320–324) and /d, g/ > /b/ in Rome Italian (Hualde & Nadeu, 2011b). However, this place of articulation hierarchy does not hold necessarily when the frequency of occurrence of stop and approximant/fricative variants of /b, d, g/ in the world’s languages is taken into consideration (Gurevich, 2004, 2011; Kaplan, 2010), and also according to other experimental studies besides those just cited (/d/ > /b, g/ in Argentine Spanish; Colantoni & Marinescu, 2010). Using an acoustic energy measure (see section 2), the present study will explore the extent to which differences in lenition degree among /b/, /d/ and /g/ conform to the place of articulation hierarchies reported for Spanish, Catalan and Italian dialectes elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The way voicing and spirantization occurred diachronically can also be synchronically observed in contemporary Romance varieties, as illustrated for Sisco Corsican (Cravens 2000;Gurevich 2004) in (2) and for Gran Canarian Spanish (Oftedal 1985;Broś 2016(providing new experimental data confirming Oftedal 1985) in (3).…”
Section: Diachronic and Synchronic Romancementioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this paper, we will address the observation that lenition processes involving voicing of intervocalic voiceless plosives and spirantization of intervocalic voiced plosives typically apply in a counter-feeding interaction (Gurevich 2004), that is the voiceless plosives surface as voiced ones, but do not partake in the modification the underlying voiced plosives are subject to: they are not further modified so as to be realized as voiced fricatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…syllable codas, foot/word-internal intervocalic C positions and foot/word-final C positions) are weak and therefore potential targets for lenition. Some examples of lenition processes are given in Table 7, while a comprehensive survey can be found in Gurevich (2004).…”
Section: Preference For Left-edge Domain Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%