2017
DOI: 10.1111/jai.13374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships of four small indigenous fish species from an inland artisanal fishery, Bangladesh

Abstract: Summary This study reports the length–weight relationships (LWRs) of four small indigenous species, Trichogaster lalius (Hamilton, 1822), Nandus meni (Hossain & Sarker, 2013), Lepidocephalichthys annandalei (Chaudhuri, 1912) and Botia dario (Hamilton, 1822) collected between July 2015 and August 2016 from fishermen's catches landed in an inland fish landing center, northeastern Bangladesh. In the study, a new maximum total length (TL) is given for L. annandalei and LWRs of three species T. lalius, N. meni and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Fishbase and scientific literature, no LWRs information was available for Ompok pabo , Acentrogobius cyanomos and A. caninus . The exponent b of LWRs for all populations fluctuated within the limit of 2.5 < b < 3.5 which were in agreement with findings of other researchers (Froese, ; Han et al., ; Ilkyaz, Metin, Soykan, & Kinacigil, ; Islam et al., ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Mahmud, ). The results obtained from the present study were also compared against Bayesian LWRs data and all are fell within the 95% confidence limits of the Bayesian prediction in FishBase (Froese, Thorson, & Reyes, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to the Fishbase and scientific literature, no LWRs information was available for Ompok pabo , Acentrogobius cyanomos and A. caninus . The exponent b of LWRs for all populations fluctuated within the limit of 2.5 < b < 3.5 which were in agreement with findings of other researchers (Froese, ; Han et al., ; Ilkyaz, Metin, Soykan, & Kinacigil, ; Islam et al., ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Mahmud, ). The results obtained from the present study were also compared against Bayesian LWRs data and all are fell within the 95% confidence limits of the Bayesian prediction in FishBase (Froese, Thorson, & Reyes, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The recommended level of water temperature was 20°C to 30°C to maintain the aquatic ecosystem [28]. But in the present study, Temperature was found a negative correlation with fish species abundance ( Table 5) which indicated that water temperature is at rising level.…”
Section: Hydrological Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The growth coefficient value b normally lies between 2.5 and 3.5 (Carlander, ; Froese, ) and this value of all three species in the present study was within the expected range as well as within the 95% confidence limits of the Bayesian LWR predictions value in Fishbase (Froese & Pauly, ). Thus, the b value of the same fish species differed with the length range used, sampling sites and season, stomach fullness, gonadal maturity, sex, diet and environmental (Islam et al., ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Fotedar, ; Siddik, Chaklader, Hanif, Islam, & Fotedar, ; Chaklader et al., ). The co‐efficient of determination ( r 2 ) values narrated the proper fitness of the model for growth (Datta, Kaur, Dhawan, & Jassal, ) and fish with ideal growth always shows co‐efficient of determination between 0.9 and <1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%