2015
DOI: 10.1111/jai.12910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships of 45 fish species in the Min River Estuary, East China Sea

Abstract: Summary Forty‐five fish species belonging to 35 genera from 22 families and 10 orders were collected during 2006–2007 by otter trawl in the Min River Estuary, East China Sea, at depths of 10–50 m, for analysis of their length–weight relationships (LWRs). Analyses included 20 species for which no previous LWR information was available in FishBase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated b values of the regression for all species were within the range (2.5 to 3.5) recommended by Carlander (1969) and Froese (1998 Kulbicki, & Labrosse, 1998;Sandhya & Shameem, 2003;Wang et al, 2016 its in all species were well within the range and overlapped with the Bayesian confidence limits in FishBase (Froese & Pauly, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated b values of the regression for all species were within the range (2.5 to 3.5) recommended by Carlander (1969) and Froese (1998 Kulbicki, & Labrosse, 1998;Sandhya & Shameem, 2003;Wang et al, 2016 its in all species were well within the range and overlapped with the Bayesian confidence limits in FishBase (Froese & Pauly, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…For, Valamugil speigleri , no information on LWR was available in FishBase (Froese & Pauly, ). Similarly, the lengths range i.e., maximum lengths recorded during present estimates (54.2 cm for P. macrolepis , 25.3 cm for C. parsia and 31.3 cm for O. cunnesius ) found larger than the lengths already reported for LWR estimates from various water bodies (van der Elst, ; Guino‐o, ; Harrison, ; Hussain, Paperno, & Khatoon, ; Kulbicki, Guillemot, & Amand, ; Letourneur, Kulbicki, & Labrosse, ; Sandhya & Shameem, ; Wang et al., ). Earlier reported maximum length in LWR estimates for P. macrolepis was only 32.2 cm SL, whereas the same for O. cunnesius was 25.5 cm SL reported by Harrison () from South African estuaries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Thus, small variations in the distinction between the measured and predicted values or those presented here vs. literature might be influenced by several factors, including the number of sampled specimens, gonad maturity, sex, and growth phase (Froese 2006). The variations in b values, compared with the available records, may be influenced by habitat type (Ruiz-Campos et al 2010), food availability, condition factor (Froese et al 2011), formalin effects on specimens (Teixeira de Mello et al 2011) or other uncontrolled factors such as seasons or extreme environments (Costa et al 2014, Wang et al 2016. Therefore, the relative growth parameters allow determining whether somatic growth is isometric or allometric (Araújo and Vicentini 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…A . latus grows fast, it can grow up to about 16 cm in body length during the first year, the length at first sexual maturity is about 24 cm and its max length recorded was up to 40 cm (Wang et al., 2016). In this study, a 40‐day tank experiment was conducted by using A .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%