Fin‐spines attachment, a novel external attachment method for the ultrasonic transmitters on hard fin‐spines fish (Sparidae)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a novel method for the external attachment of ultrasonic transmitters on hard fin‐spines fish (Sparidae). Acanthopagrus latus, one of the main stocking Sparidae fishes in the northern South China Sea, was employed to conduct the 40‐day tank experiment by using dummy ultrasonic transmitters. The experiment consisted of 3 treatment groups, i.e., drilling on dorsal fin‐spine (DD) group, drilling on anal fin‐spine (DA) group, and control (C) group, with each group having 3 replicates and 30 fish per replicate. The feasibilities of DD and DA for the external attachment of ultrasonic transmitters were tested and evaluated using parameters: the specific growth rate, survival rate, and tag retention rate of each group. And the tagging procedures for the external attachment of hard fin‐spines fish were also proposed. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the specific growth rate of fish between groups. Both the survival rates of DD group (96.67%) and DA group (94.44%) were less (but not significant) than C group (97.78%), while the tag retention rate of DA group (100%) was higher (but not significant) than DD group (98.89%). These results demonstrate that drilling on dorsal or anal fin‐spines is feasible as an external attachment method of ultrasonic transmitters on Sparidae fishes. In addition, considering the friction between the tagged transmitters and rocks at the bottom of natural waters, which possibly affect the fish behaviors such as swimming, feeding, etc., or lead to tag loss, so drilling on the dorsal fin‐spine is preferred for rocky‐bottom Sparidae fishes like A. latus as small as 14 cm body length.

River Damming Impacts on Fish Habitat and Associated Conservation Measures

“…The total number of fishes that inhabits a certain area release (Lyu et al, 2021). Resource restoration aims at restoring fishery resources and improving the economic benefits of fisheries, and thus the evaluation has mainly focused on the catch rate.…”

“…Evaluation of the effectiveness of artificial breeding and release depends on the specific objectives of the measure, and generally focuses on the growth of fry and the contribution to target fish resources as well as the related economic, ecological and social benefits (Rytwinski et al., 2021). Ecological restoration aims at conserving endangered species, and the evaluation mainly focuses on the survival rate and natural reproduction of artificially hatched fry after release (Lyu et al., 2021). Resource restoration aims at restoring fishery resources and improving the economic benefits of fisheries, and thus the evaluation has mainly focused on the catch rate.…”

Designing and the Pilot Trial of Bivalve Molluscan Fishing Quotas on Maoming Coastal Waters of China, Northern South China Sea

“…In China, fisheries management with most fishing vessels and most fishermen seem to be the most complex in the world (Huang and He, 2019). The administrative departments of fishery in China have carried out a series of measures to improve marine fishery resources, such as summer fishing moratorium, minimum mesh size regulation, fishing license system, the socalled "Double Control" system, fishery stock enhancement programs, establishment of artificial reefs, and placements of aquatic germplasm resource-protection areas, which belong primarily to the input and technical control management, whereas the effect is limited (Shen and Heino, 2014;Lyu et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021). In 2000, the government of China revised the Fishery Law of the People's Republic of China, making it clear that China will determine TAC and implement an FQ system (Gu, 2018).…”

Optimization of a Marine Fish Release Strategy: A Case Study of Black Sea Bream Acanthopagrus schlegelii in the Zhanjiang Estuary, Northern South China Sea

“…Since the evaluation of stocking success (including ecological and economic aspects) (Bell et al, 2006;Kitada, 2018) is time-consuming and expensive, modeling the stocking programs with simulation can help us assess and improve the stocking programs (Ingram, and De Silva, 2015). The evaluation of stocking effects is also a part of fish stock assessment; most of the stock assessment techniques can be used to estimate the stocks and biological parameters of released populations, such as natural mortality, release mortality (Benaka et al, 2014), post-release survival, and recapture rate (Kitada et al, 1992;Støttrup et al, 2002;Lyu et al, 2021). The optimization of the release strategy must consider the technique for breeding the stocked species and fishing, and also the tradeoffs between the costs of breeding and the benefits of stocking (Kellison and Eggleston, 2004).…”