2018
DOI: 10.18646/2056.54.18-020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® In Multidisciplinary Student Teams

Abstract: This research paper reports on a series of undergraduate workshops that tested the LEGO ® SERIOUS PLAY ® (LSP) method for facilitating deliberation in multidisciplinary teams of students considering the social, ethical, and environmental implications of nanotechnology. As a wicked problem, nanotechnology warrants thorough examination and deliberation involving multiple stakeholders to ensure responsible innovation and governance. However, many conventional approaches to wicked problems fail to address the diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By adhering to the highest levels of testing, the LEGO® Group ensures that its products meet the highest quality standards and demonstrate the greatest level of responsibility to its stakeholders by promoting an environment that fosters creativity and innovation (Jensen, Seager & Cook-Davis 2018). Random testing throughout the manufacturing process and customer input are all approaches through which quality assurance is carried out in research and development (R&D) (Zosh et al 2017).…”
Section: Lego®mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adhering to the highest levels of testing, the LEGO® Group ensures that its products meet the highest quality standards and demonstrate the greatest level of responsibility to its stakeholders by promoting an environment that fosters creativity and innovation (Jensen, Seager & Cook-Davis 2018). Random testing throughout the manufacturing process and customer input are all approaches through which quality assurance is carried out in research and development (R&D) (Zosh et al 2017).…”
Section: Lego®mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sets were assembled in plastic sorting boxes before transportation to school. Other items included tablecloths to damp classroom noise (Jensen et al, 2018), sticky notes, rechargeable speakers, and instruments (our own and classroom resources) for scaffolding and performance. Instructions were created as a photo sequence (see example step in Figure 1).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when LEGO® is introduced as a thinking tool, the outcome is highly likely to vary according to who is participating in the work. Furthermore, students are assigned to an individual LEGO® activity in some educational cases (Lindsay et al, 2017), while in other cases, they are assigned to collaborative work using LEGO® bricks (Dumitraşcu et al, 2014;Jensen et al, 2018). This suggests that LEGO® applications can be further classified according to the number of students engaged in LEGO® activities.…”
Section: Classification Of Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%