2019
DOI: 10.1177/0974686219881092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legitimising the Role of Corporate Boards and Corporate Social Responsibility on the Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies

Abstract: The prime objective of this study is to investigate the legitimate role of corporate boards and corporate social responsibility on the performance of Malaysian listed companies during 2006–2017. Elements of corporate boards include board size, board independence and board diversity, whereas corporate social responsibility (CSR) dimensions constitute marketplace, environment, community and workplace. Both accounting-based (return on assets [ROA], return on equity [ROE]) and market-based (earnings per share [EPS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, executive directors' remuneration is negatively related to environment and community practices (H2 partially rejected). These findings connote the over-investment hypothesis based on agency theory presumptions that CEOs and executive directors working for socially responsible practices tend to use corporate resources for their personal benefits (Karim et al , 2019; Miles and Miles, 2013). Ultimately, it is the shareholder who bears the cost of socially responsible activities indicating an inverse relationship between the remuneration pattern of CEOs, executive directors and socially responsible activities (Cai et al , 2011).…”
Section: Dynamic Panel Regression Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, executive directors' remuneration is negatively related to environment and community practices (H2 partially rejected). These findings connote the over-investment hypothesis based on agency theory presumptions that CEOs and executive directors working for socially responsible practices tend to use corporate resources for their personal benefits (Karim et al , 2019; Miles and Miles, 2013). Ultimately, it is the shareholder who bears the cost of socially responsible activities indicating an inverse relationship between the remuneration pattern of CEOs, executive directors and socially responsible activities (Cai et al , 2011).…”
Section: Dynamic Panel Regression Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Given this turbulent economic period, the global financial markets have shown higher connectedness revealing varying attitudes of investors toward abrupt changes in the business situations (Rufino, 2018; Karim et al. , 2019a, b; Lopatta et al. , 2019; Eckert et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between the performance of a firm and CSR has been excessively researched ( Creixans-Tenas et al., 2019 ; Islam et al., 2021 ). While some studies have investigated the direct impact of CSR on the performance of a firm ( Agyemang Otuo and Ansong, 2017 ; Jang Soojeen et al., 2019 ; Karim et al., 2019 ; Yoon and Chung, 2018 ), others claimed that this association might be influenced by some other intervening parameters and involved other factors in their studies ( Hasanudin et al., 2019 ; Saeidi et al., 2015 ). For example, using data gathered from the 3401 observations of the publicly traded firms in China (2009–2015) by Jia (2020) showed that CSR could improve the performance of the firm when its strategy emphasizes the value appropriation more than the value creation.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%