Legitimating a platform: evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter

Abstract

Studies suggest a growing interdependence between journalists and Twitter. What is behind this interdependence, and how does it manifest in news texts? We argue that social media platforms (and Twitter in particular) have situated themselves as purveyors of legitimated content, a projection that journalists have not fully challenged and at times abetted. Instead, journalists rely on these platforms both for access to powerful users and as conduits to surface the words of 'ordinary people.' This practice treats tweets more like content, an interchangeable building block of news, than like sources, whose ideas and messages must be verified. Using a corpus of U.S. news stories with tweets in them, we provide empirical evidence for our argument of the power of platforms to legitimate speech and shape journalism. This study illuminates journalists' role in transferring some of the press's authority to Twitter, thereby shaping the participants in and content of public deliberation.

Say Their Names: Resurgence in the collective attention toward Black victims of fatal police violence following the death of George Floyd

“…Instead, social media gives activists, on-the-ground protesters, citizen journalists, and others a way to bypass traditional top-down structures of information dissemination and directly share their experiences with the public [10]. Exactly because social media-and Twitter in particular-are valuable sources of information during rapidly evolving events, such as protests, journalists often look to online conversations to understand emerging events [11]. Rather than having to appeal directly to print and news media then, activists and others can find their messaging distributed more broadly in the public sphere when it is picked up by journalists via social media [12,13].…”

Digital Technology, Politics, and Policy-Making

“…Experimental evidence shows that journalists consider tweets as newsworthy as authoritative sources such as the Associated Press (McGregor and Molyneux, 2020). Furthermore, journalists tend to use tweets more as pieces of content rather than sources that need to be critically evaluated (Molyneux and McGregor, 2021). In turn, this practice contributes to legitimizing not only individual tweets, but Twitter as a whole as an authoritative source of information.…”

Journalismus und Instagram

“…Diese neue Herausforderung, mit alternativen Ereignisdarstellungen und unterschiedlichen Realitätskonstruktionen umzugehen, erfordert eine grundsätzliche Offenheit im Umgang mit verschiedenen Perspektiven und zusätzliche Kompetenzen, u. a. in der Faktenprüfung . Darüber hinaus wird sich der Journalismus auch stärker mit seinen eigenen kognitiven und sozialisatorischen Verzerrungen und eingeschliffenen Berichterstattungsmustern auseinandersetzen und sie hinterfragen müssen (Molyneux & McGregor, 2021). Somit ist einerseits dringend mehr personelle Vielfalt in den Redaktionen notwendig (z.…”