2014
DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2013.809339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legislative Responses to Terrorism: What Drives States to Adopt New Counterterrorism Legislation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flere land (deriblant Norge) har etter 2011 blant annet fått egne spesifikke terrorlover (Pokalova 2015;Lehrke & Schomaker 2014). Epifanio (2011) viser at vestlige demokratier etter 11. september har redusert individers frihet (personvernet) ved i økt grad å tillate skjulte politimetoder, begrenset rettighetene til enkeltindivider mistenkt for terror (svekket rettssikkerheten This article is downloaded from www.idunn.no.…”
Section: Tematisk Bakgrunnunclassified
“…Flere land (deriblant Norge) har etter 2011 blant annet fått egne spesifikke terrorlover (Pokalova 2015;Lehrke & Schomaker 2014). Epifanio (2011) viser at vestlige demokratier etter 11. september har redusert individers frihet (personvernet) ved i økt grad å tillate skjulte politimetoder, begrenset rettighetene til enkeltindivider mistenkt for terror (svekket rettssikkerheten This article is downloaded from www.idunn.no.…”
Section: Tematisk Bakgrunnunclassified
“…Instead, after 9/11, the most significant predictor has been participation in the War on Terror and existing counterterrorism legislation. 15 This same phenomenon is also apparent in Mariya Y. Omelicheva's study of Estonian counterterrorism policy. Like Finland, the terrorist threat in Estonia has been considered very low.…”
Section: The Changing Dynamics Of Counterterrorismmentioning
confidence: 73%