Legislating at the shopfloor level: Background knowledge and relevant context of parliamentary debates

Dupret, Baudouin; Ferrié, Jean-Noël

doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.08.012

Cited by 18 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other interactional studies of political speech have shown how participants in a given institutional context-like news interviews (Clayman, 2009;Heritage & Greatbatch, 1991) or speeches (Atkinson, 1984;Heritage & Greatbatch, 1986)-interactionally produce said context and its normative organization. Much of this body of work has focused on English-speaking contexts and American political talk, including work on U.S. presidential (Clayman, 1992(Clayman, , 1995 and U.K. parliamentary debates (Dupret & Ferrie, 2008;Reber, 2019Reber, , 2021. Speech-making is particularly interesting in part because of the institutional features structuring the availability of extended turns, limits on response relevance and response type, and contextual constraints on sequence organization.…”

Section: Negotiating the Mainstreammentioning

confidence: 99%

Negotiating the mainstream: Proximate stancetaking and far‐right policy proposals in Bundestag debates

Sterphone

2022

Journal of Sociolinguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During talk, parliamentarians (re)negotiate the boundaries of mainstream and marginal politics. With far-right parties in parliament(s) in force, center-right parties-especially those that have coopted far-right stances-must establish Bundestag, conversation analysis, ethnomethodology, Germany, membership categories, talk-in-interaction Zusammenfassung In ihren Gesprächen verhandeln Parlamentarier*innen die Grenzen von Mainstream-und Randpolitik (neu) aus. Wenn rechtsextreme Parteien in/m Parlament(en) in Kraft sind, müssen Parteien die sich mitte-rechts verorten -insbesondere diejenigen, die rechtsextreme Positionen eingenommen haben -ihre Position innerhalb des

show abstract

Section: Negotiating the Mainstreammentioning

confidence: 99%

Negotiating the mainstream: Proximate stancetaking and far‐right policy proposals in Bundestag debates

Sterphone

2022

Journal of Sociolinguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At this stage, we need to make a remark as to what we mean by context in the study of media productions. Indeed, theories and conceptions of context are many (see Dupret and Ferrié, 2008). There is obviously a consensus on the necessity to consider the context as primordial, although there is little agreement on the meaning to give to such an assumption.…”

Section: ) Conflicting Narratives Regarding Heritage In the Middle-eastmentioning

confidence: 99%

The concept of heritage and the grammar of Islamic fundamentalism

Dupret

Gutron

2020

Memory Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Islamic fundamentalism is a way to oppose the counter-narrative of an exclusive Islamic civilization to the universalist master-narrative of history’s pluralistic heritage. Two methods of reading the past collide here. One is a genealogical method, which values anything that relates the present to its historical roots. The other is a fundamentalist method, which relies on sacred scriptures in order to identify a founding age it arrogates to itself and to condemn anything that does not correspond to it. These two perspectives function in a conflicting yet interdependent manner. This article aims to describe the operating modes of these two narratives. First, it examines how the concept of heritage acquired new meanings and transformed into an evaluation table with which to assess past, present, and future collective identities. Second, it describes some audiovisual productions relating to the antique city of Hatra, to the destruction of its statues by Islamic State’s fighters, and to its symbolism. On this basis, it analyzes these productions in terms of heritage master- and counter-narratives. Third, it addresses, in relation to the issue of heritage, the fundamentalist discursive structure, its grammar, the entrenchment of its rules, and the demarcation it implies between the community of believers and everyone else.

show abstract

“…Parliamentary debates have also been examined from the point of view of contextual analysis (Dupret and Ferrié, 2008; Van Dijk, 2004, 2008), intertextual analysis and the media representation of parliamentary discourse (Archakis and Tsakona, 2009, 2010; Gadavanij, 2002).…”

Section: Previous Research On Parliamentary Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro

Vuković

2012

Discourse & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pronominal choice in political talk reflects hidden ideologies, which is why it has been a muchstudied phenomenon in the discourse analytic research of politics in western democracies. However, similar topics remain largely unexplored in eastern and transition countries. With this in mind, the aim of the present article is to explore the use of subject pronouns and the person of the verb in the Parliament of Montenegro. The budget debate conducted in December 2009 was chosen for the corpus and was later subdivided into 10-minute pre-prepared 'Speeches' and three-minute 'Comments', which represent spontaneous responses. The two subcorpora were then compared with respect to person deixis. The results of the study point to the fact that, when given the chance to carefully plan their talk in advance, the MPs used the first-person plural and positive self-campaign much more often. On the other hand, in their spontaneous talk, the MPs more often referred to themselves as individuals and resorted more readily to addressing others using negative presentation strategies. Their prepared talk was therefore crafted and tailored for political effect through the use of consciously employed persuasive strategies that relate to the choice of person. It is suggested that the comparison of pre-scripted and unscripted political talk can reveal underlying political ideologies.

show abstract

Legislating at the shopfloor level: Background knowledge and relevant context of parliamentary debates

Cited by 18 publications

References 3 publications

Negotiating the mainstream: Proximate stancetaking and far‐right policy proposals in Bundestag debates

Negotiating the mainstream: Proximate stancetaking and far‐right policy proposals in Bundestag debates

The concept of heritage and the grammar of Islamic fundamentalism

Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About