2007
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-07-04337-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legendrian contact homology in 𝑃×ℝ

Abstract: Abstract. A rigorous foundation for the contact homology of Legendrian submanifolds in a contact manifold of the form P × R, where P is an exact symplectic manifold, is established. The class of such contact manifolds includes 1-jet spaces of smooth manifolds. As an application, contact homology is used to provide (smooth) isotopy invariants of submanifolds of R n and, more generally, invariants of self transverse immersions into R n up to restricted regular homotopies. When n = 3, this application is the firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
289
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
289
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should clearly be related to the theory of Legendrian contact homology, which was described informally by Eliashberg, Givental and Hofer [5, §2.8], and by Chekanov [4] for Legendrian knots in R 3 , and has been developed rigorously by Ekholm, Etnyre and Sullivan [6,7], for embedded Legendrians L in R 2n+1 and in M × R for (M, ω) an exact symplectic manifold. In particular, for (M, ω) exact one can compare our HF * (L, b; Λ Z nov ) for embedded Legendrians in M × S 1 , and Ekholm et al's HC * (L, J) for embedded Legendrians L in M × R, [7].…”
Section: Bounding Cochains and Lagrangian Floer Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This should clearly be related to the theory of Legendrian contact homology, which was described informally by Eliashberg, Givental and Hofer [5, §2.8], and by Chekanov [4] for Legendrian knots in R 3 , and has been developed rigorously by Ekholm, Etnyre and Sullivan [6,7], for embedded Legendrians L in R 2n+1 and in M × R for (M, ω) an exact symplectic manifold. In particular, for (M, ω) exact one can compare our HF * (L, b; Λ Z nov ) for embedded Legendrians in M × S 1 , and Ekholm et al's HC * (L, J) for embedded Legendrians L in M × R, [7].…”
Section: Bounding Cochains and Lagrangian Floer Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This should clearly be related to the theory of Legendrian contact homology, which was described informally by Eliashberg, Givental and Hofer [5, §2.8], and by Chekanov [4] for Legendrian knots in R 3 , and has been developed rigorously by Ekholm, Etnyre and Sullivan [6,7], for embedded Legendrians L in R 2n+1 and in M × R for (M, ω) an exact symplectic manifold. In particular, for (M, ω) exact one can compare our HF * (L, b; Λ Z nov ) for embedded Legendrians in M × S 1 , and Ekholm et al's HC * (L, J) for embedded Legendrians L in M × R, [7]. It seems that HC * (L, J) should be a sector of HF * (L, b; Λ Z nov ), but not the whole thing, since HC * (L; J) is the homology of a complex involving H 1 (L; Z) and the set of double points of π(L) in M , but HF * (L, b; Λ Z nov ) is the cohomology of a complex involving all of H * (L; Q) and R, which has two points (p − , p + ), (p + , p − ) for each double point p of π(L) in M .…”
Section: Bounding Cochains and Lagrangian Floer Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this section we give an outline of the theory of Legendrian contact homology [21,8,18] as well as certain constructions from relative symplectic field theory [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the construction and the invariance of Legendrian contact homology have been worked out in the case (J 1 R, λ 0 ) by Chekanov [8], and in more general contactisations (P × R, dz + θ) by Ekholm, Etnyre and Sullivan [18], where (P, dθ) is an exact symplectic manifold having finite geometry at infinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key breakthrough in the study of Legendrian knots, and symplectic topology generally, was the introduction of Gromov-type holomorphic-curve techniques in the 1990s. This led in particular to the development of Legendrian contact homology, outlined by Eliashberg and Hofer [Eli98] and fleshed out famously by Chekanov [Che02] for standard contact R 3 and later by others in more general setups (e.g., [EES05a,EES07,NT04,Sab03]). Besides applications to contact topology, Legendrian contact homology has been closely linked to standard knot theory (e.g., [Ng08]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%