Legal and Regulatory Barriers to Reverse Innovation

Rowthorn, Virginia; Plum, Alexander; Zervos, John

doi:10.1016/j.aogh.2016.10.013

Cited by 13 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, there may be some other paths in the formation of highvalue patents that we have not discussed, and more cases should be analyzed to test the model. ese limitations also provide interesting issues for future studies [38][39][40][41][42][43].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of High-Value Patents in Reverse Innovation: Focus on Chinese Local Enterprises

Wei

Liu

2020

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The lack of high-value patents constraints the reverse innovation of developing countries’ local enterprises. To explore how high-value patents evolve within reverse innovation in these enterprises, this paper proposes a theoretical framework to analyze the relationships among technology, law, and market values for high-value patents and builds a three-dimensional Lotka–Volterra model of high-value patents under this framework. Using this model, this study explores the evolution path and the optimal conditions for the formation high-value patents. We take a local Chinese company, Huawei, as a case to test the theoretical analysis and make some managerial suggestions accordingly. Our research provides a theoretical basis for cultivating high-value patents in reverse innovation in local enterprises in China and other developing countries.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of High-Value Patents in Reverse Innovation: Focus on Chinese Local Enterprises

Wei

Liu

2020

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Learning From Others: Comprehensive Health Equity Strategies in Europe [76] • Shared Learning in an Interconnected World: Innovations to Advance Global Health Equity [69] • Learning from the World: Global Strategies for Improving Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health [24] • Impact Innovation: Closing Health Inequities Through Design [77] Sources in this category include relatively simple guidelines and frameworks based on the authors' observations as global health researchers; frameworks developed by experts within organizations interested in or practicing global learning; and frameworks developed and refined through systematic research and/or expert panels. Some of the papers in this category highlighted barriers and facilitators to global learning including legal and regulatory barriers and recommendations for overcoming them [81]. One of the papers also identified challenges, resistance, and facilitators that should be considered for uptake of global learning [16].…”

Section: Global Learning Guidelines or Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Learning for Health Equity: A Literature Review

Ogbolu

Dudding

Fiori

et al. 2022

Annals of Global Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:In high income countries struggling with escalating health care costs and persistent lack of equity, there is growing interest in searching for innovative solutions developed outside national borders, particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Engaging with global ideas to apply them to local health equity challenges is becoming increasingly recognized as an approach to shift the health equity landscape in the United States (US) in a significant way. No single name or set of practices yet defines the process of identifying LMIC interventions for adaptation; implementing interventions in high-income countries (HIC) settings; or evaluating the implementation of such projects.Objectives: This paper presents a review of the literature describing the practice of adapting global ideas for use in the US, particularly in the area of health equity. Specifically, the authors sought to examine; (i) the literature that advocates for, or describes, adaption of health-related innovations from LMICs to HICs, both generally and for health equity specifically, and (ii) implementation practices, strategies, and evidence-based outcomes in this field, generally and in the area of health equity specifically. The authors also propose terminology and a definition to describe the practice. Methods:The literature search included two main concepts: global learning and health equity (using these and related terms). The search consisted of text-words and databasespecific terminology (e.g., MeSH, Emtree) using PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Scopus in March 2021. The authors also contacted relevant experts to identify grey literature. Identified sources were categorized according to theme to facilitate analysis. In addition, five key interviews with experts engaged with global ideas to promote health equity in the United States were conducted to develop additional data.

show abstract

“…Nowhere is this more apparent than in the disparity in innovation diffusion between 'high-low' and 'low-high' contexts. While the high-low path of innovation has been a widely accepted expectation and norm (thus, without significant barriers), challenges to 'low-high' diffusion have included regulation hurdles, legal barriers, and stigmas based on negative perceptions regarding source location, adherence to quality standards, and relevance or applicability in HIC [11,12]. In fact, even the name used most often in the literature to refer to 'low-high' innovations (i.e.…”

Section: Figure 1: Innovation and Diffusion Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

An innovation platform for diffusing public health practices across a global network

Plum

Tanniru

Khuntia

2020

Health Policy and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hospitals and health systems in high-income countries (HIC) develop the capacities of peer healthcare organizations around the world by diffusing clinical, quality, and public health improvement practices in lower and middle-income countries (LMIC). In turn, these HIC healthcare institutions are exposed to innovative approaches developed and used by global communities to advance care despite resource constraints in the LMIC contexts. Attention has been growing in recent years to the potential these innovations can have to improve care delivery, lower costs, and drive quality within resource constrained communities in HIC. Often referred to as 'reverse innovations,' the identification, adaptation, and diffusion of these practices face challenges in uptake related to limited evidence, perceptions of poor quality or irrelevance, and a complicated regulatory and policy environment. This paper suggests the development of a knowledge platform to support diffusion of innovative health practices along a global community continuum and illustrates its potential use.

show abstract

Legal and Regulatory Barriers to Reverse Innovation

Cited by 13 publications

References 8 publications

Evolution of High-Value Patents in Reverse Innovation: Focus on Chinese Local Enterprises

Evolution of High-Value Patents in Reverse Innovation: Focus on Chinese Local Enterprises

Global Learning for Health Equity: A Literature Review

An innovation platform for diffusing public health practices across a global network

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About