1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)33386-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left Ventricular Function After Resection of the Papillary Muscles in Patients With Total Mitral Valve Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite existing evidence suggesting that SAP reduces morbidity and mortality [ 9 - 17 ] the sub-valvular apparatus is not always preserved often because it is not possible to preserve them. It is argued that the preserved sub-valvular apparatus prevent an adequately sized prosthetic valve from being used, and cause left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, by interfering with prosthetic valve function [ 26 , 57 - 60 ]. Whilst techniques to eliminate outflow tract obstruction following sub-valvular apparatus preservation have been described [ 27 ], it is reported that some of the preservation techniques cause alteration of the left ventricular geometry, causing rupture of the papillary muscles, systemic embolization and dehiscence of the mitral leaflets from their transposed positions as well as increasing ischemic time [ 26 , 56 - 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite existing evidence suggesting that SAP reduces morbidity and mortality [ 9 - 17 ] the sub-valvular apparatus is not always preserved often because it is not possible to preserve them. It is argued that the preserved sub-valvular apparatus prevent an adequately sized prosthetic valve from being used, and cause left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, by interfering with prosthetic valve function [ 26 , 57 - 60 ]. Whilst techniques to eliminate outflow tract obstruction following sub-valvular apparatus preservation have been described [ 27 ], it is reported that some of the preservation techniques cause alteration of the left ventricular geometry, causing rupture of the papillary muscles, systemic embolization and dehiscence of the mitral leaflets from their transposed positions as well as increasing ischemic time [ 26 , 56 - 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chordal preservation was initially introduced by Lillehei and colleagues 2 in 1964 but did not gain popularity because of the potentially detrimental effects reported by Bjoerk and colleagues. 3 Its re-emergence was largely due to David and colleagues 4 who described it as an important method of preserving LV function after MVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results confirmed the functional importance of the subvalvar apparatus, showing a significant reduction in operative mortality of patients operated on by the team. These results, however, were immediately contested by Bjoerk et al [4] and Rastelli et al [5] in independent studies. However, after the results of Carpentier [6] and stimulated by the studies of Miller et al [7] and David et al [8][9][10][11], mitral operations with partial or total preservation of the cuspids and papillary muscles continued [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%