Depending on the size and location of the tumor, a patent left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) can be technically intimidating to a thoracic surgeon hoping for an R0 resection with a left upper lobectomy. Dr Wei and colleagues 1 at the University of Alabama are to be congratulated for their description and excellent results on successfully completing anatomic lung cancer resections of the left upper lobe in 28 patients who previously underwent CABG with LITA grafts. In fact, the surgical literature implies that we are batting 1000 when it comes to safety and effectiveness in this situation, even if the operations are performed with lessinvasive techniques, such as video-assisted thoracic surgery or the surgical robot. 1-3 Furthermore, the authors are so confident in their technical ability to safely dissect the lung off the LITA that they perform their operations without an arterial line, central venous access, or a Foley catheter, not that those things necessarily would be life saving should the surgeon acutely disrupt a LITA to left anterior descending graft with the potential for acute cardiac ischemia and ventricular fibrillation.In my mind, a patent LITA graft at the time of left upper lobectomy has the potential to pose a serious and potentially lethal threat to the thoracic surgeon and patient no matter what the operative approach. Although the authors suggest potential strategies for repairing and recovering from an injury to what is usually the most important coronary graft, the scenario of a disrupted coronary artery graft in a reoperative field while working in the left lateral decubitus position without easy exposure and access to cardiopulmonary bypass to is be avoided at all costs. The authors skillfully and successfully accomplished this.The keys to success in this clinical scenario seem obvious but are not to be underestimated. The authors provide a logical and thorough algorithm for both evaluating and surgically treating patients with left upper lobe lesions who have previously undergone CABG with a LITA. Although only 86% of patients in this series underwent cardiac stress testing before operation, it would seem that this should be mandatory in this situation, followed by coronary angiography should the patient be symptomatic or ischemic. Computed tomography angiography is useful to identify the anatomic location of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft relative to the lung and tumor, and can assist in operative planning. I would agree with the authors that the ability to review the previous CABG operative report is important although not always realistic, even in this era of electronic medical records. Although all of the ITA grafts in this series were pedicle grafts that are thicker and relatively easily identified by the presence of surgical clips, FIGURE 1. Large tumors that are medial and potentially involving a patent ITA graft may be a contraindication to resection.With a patent ITA graft, tumor location and size are key when planning left upper ...