2001
DOI: 10.1090/conm/289/04874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lecture notes on dyadic harmonic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choosing λ ≥ (4C) 1/p−1 , we obtain a contradiction to (10). This proves that for λ ≥ (4C) 1/p−1 , there exists a constant 0 < c < 1 such that |G(J)| ≤ c |J| for all J ∈ D. It then follows by induction that |G k (J)| ≤ c k |J| for k ∈ N and J ∈ D.…”
Section: Weights With Reverse Hölder Property and Decaying Stopping Timementioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Choosing λ ≥ (4C) 1/p−1 , we obtain a contradiction to (10). This proves that for λ ≥ (4C) 1/p−1 , there exists a constant 0 < c < 1 such that |G(J)| ≤ c |J| for all J ∈ D. It then follows by induction that |G k (J)| ≤ c k |J| for k ∈ N and J ∈ D.…”
Section: Weights With Reverse Hölder Property and Decaying Stopping Timementioning
confidence: 82%
“…We use a slightly different route from [2], [7]. Instead of using the weighted maximal function, we show first that the weighted square function operator is bounded and bounded below by means of a stopping time argument from [10]. This gives us the uniform boundedness of the weighted dyadic martingale transforms.…”
Section: /2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this note we want to highlight the interplay with dyadic harmonic analysis [62] in the solution of the A 2 conjecture. Initially the A 2 conjecture was shown to hold, one at a time, for dyadic operators and for operators such as the Hilbert transform that have lots of symmetries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from one main new result (a local T(b) theorem), we shall mostly take existing results (atomic decompositions, paraproduct estimates, Carleson embedding) and re-prove them in a framework which unifies both the Carleson measure theory and the theory of trees and tiles. (As such there is some overlap with the recent lecture notes in [49]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%