2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3030044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Least Squares Relativistic Generative Adversarial Network for Perceptual Super-Resolution Imaging

Abstract: Currently, deep-learning-based methods have been the most popular super-resolution techniques owing to the improvement of super-resolution performance. However, they are still lack perceptual fine details and thus result in unsatisfying visual quality. This paper proposes a novel method for high-quality perceptual super-resolution imaging, named SRLRGAN-SN. It aims to recovery visually plausible images with perceptual texture details by using the least squares relativistic generative adversarial network (GAN).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A CGAN has a simple and straightforward architecture, yet can produce images similar to real ones. Compared to other GAN architectures that may produce better quality images, such as the least-squares generative adversarial network (LSGAN) [52] and information maximizing GAN (InfoGAN) [53], these architectures have large computational budgets and generating images is time-consuming, whereas CGANs are simpler and do not require long computation times. They can synthesize good-quality images from the original dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CGAN has a simple and straightforward architecture, yet can produce images similar to real ones. Compared to other GAN architectures that may produce better quality images, such as the least-squares generative adversarial network (LSGAN) [52] and information maximizing GAN (InfoGAN) [53], these architectures have large computational budgets and generating images is time-consuming, whereas CGANs are simpler and do not require long computation times. They can synthesize good-quality images from the original dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training process of standard GAN (StdGAN) is unstable because the architecture of the discriminative network is nontransformed and saturated [46,52]. RaGAN is an extension of StdGAN where the discriminative network takes a relativistic and non-saturating form [52][53][54]. Therefore, rather than measuring the probability that the input land cover map M is realistic and generated in StdGAN, RaGAN predicts whether a land cover map Mr from the training dataset is more realistic than a fake one, Mf (Mf=G(I)).…”
Section: Discriminative Network Dsgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…? Also, in recent years, GAN based architecture: Relativistic GAN , 16 ESRGAN ; 9 and channel attention-based architecture: RGAN 17 provide promising results for the problem of SISR in terms of image quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%