2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2006.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Least-squares-based fitting of paraboloids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] Then, the parameters were refined using a custom-made iterative optimization algorithm, based on evolution strategies. [25] Residual fitting errors were measured for global and local HPs by computing the distance distributions of the surface points to the estimated models.…”
Section: Trochlear Surface Modeling Through Hyperbolic Paraboloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7] Then, the parameters were refined using a custom-made iterative optimization algorithm, based on evolution strategies. [25] Residual fitting errors were measured for global and local HPs by computing the distance distributions of the surface points to the estimated models.…”
Section: Trochlear Surface Modeling Through Hyperbolic Paraboloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5] From a surgical point of view, the extent of the morphologic variations is determinant for the selection of the optimal implant in trochleoplasty interventions. [6][7][8][9][10] Evaluating the morphologic deviations to normality is however complicated by the fact that the three-dimensional (3D) geometric profile of the trochlea is extremely complex and sensibly varies amongst individuals. [11][12][13] One of the most applied clinical approach to score the morphologic anomalies of the trochlear surface (TS) is based on the Dejour classification, which encompasses four different qualitative Grades (A, B, C, D) of increasing severity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For curved surfaces quadrics are a natural option; Petitjean [2] surveyed quadric fitting, but there were few results that (a) quantified uncertainty, (b) recovered geometric parameterizations, and (c) fit bounded patches. In [5], Dai et al describe recovery of paraboloid geometric parameters 1 by linear least squares, without considering uncertainty. In [17] Wang et al studied quadric extraction in the context of range image segmentation, including quantified uncertainty in the algebraic (not geometric) patch parameters, but not on the input points.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric (vs. algebraic) parameterizations also support reasoning [5] about possible actions with patches, and allow some representation of spatial uncertainty with geometric error ellipsoids in task space. Minimality is desirable because redundant (non-minimal) parameterizations can slow the numerical optimizations used in surface fitting [6] and must be handled specially in uncertainty modeling [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A random sample consensus paradigm (Fischler and Bolles 1981) integrated with the least-square-based quadric surface fitting algorithm (Dai et al 2007) was applied to estimate geometric parameters of this hyperboloid model and, simultaneously, to handle a large portion of outliers in the relatively large number of sample points at the femoral neck.…”
Section: Automatic 3d Reference Coordinate System Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%