2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning where to look for COVID-19 growth: Multivariate analysis of COVID-19 cases over time using explainable convolution–LSTM

Abstract: Determinant factors which contribute to the prediction should take into account multivariate analysis for capturing coarse-to-fine contextual information. From the preliminary descriptive analysis, it shows that environmental factor such as UV (ultraviolet) is one of the essential factors that should be considered to observe the COVID-19 epidemic drivers. Moreover, there are education, government, morphological, health, economic, and behavioral factors contributing to the growth of COVID-19. Besides descriptiv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(18 reference statements)
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 4 , we compared our 1D CNN model’s results with those of other 1D CNN architectures for classifying short and long survival groups. Our findings suggest that our model’s performance is comparable to state-of-the-art models, as described in [45] , [46] , [47] , and [48] . Specifically, we achieved a higher AUC (90.25% versus 84.36–88.10%) and accuracy (83.75% versus 79.06–81.94%) than these previous CNN architectures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In Table 4 , we compared our 1D CNN model’s results with those of other 1D CNN architectures for classifying short and long survival groups. Our findings suggest that our model’s performance is comparable to state-of-the-art models, as described in [45] , [46] , [47] , and [48] . Specifically, we achieved a higher AUC (90.25% versus 84.36–88.10%) and accuracy (83.75% versus 79.06–81.94%) than these previous CNN architectures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In total, there are 13 variants with minimum loss values. This result is consistent with similar studies implementing Multivariate[7] [20][21]. Multivariate can provide better results because more data is processed at one time, contrary to Univariate, in which computing one data at a time allows the model to train better and use data with more variety.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…AI-based methods are also applied in the feld of disease detection and control; Öztürk and Özkaya [26] designed a classifer by using LSTM and CNN methods to diagnose gastrointestinal tract diseases. Kanipriya et al [27] and Yudistira et al [28] constructed diferent LSTM models to detect the malignant lung nodule or the growth of COVID-19 cases. Lee et al [29] predicted Parkinson's disease using gradient boosting 2…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%