In recent years, the concept "making" has been claimed by "The Maker Movement." While making offers great potential (and resources) for art integration in informal learning sites, maker discourse is often intertwined with a neoliberal mission. For example, movement leaders glorify Steve Jobs and hark on the myth that hobbies can be transformed into wealth-generating endeavors. As art-making activities in informal learning setting across the U.S. intersect with the maker movement, prominent learning theories that contradict this neoliberal philosophy may be repurposed or disremembered. Constructionist learning will require a continued commitment to a notion of learning by doing, "rather than acquiring theoretical precepts for subsequent application" (Ingold, 2013, p. 52). This article examines research from a multi-year empirical study of a Public Library system's arts-based maker program. It provides a rich example of how discourse around making fits into learning in arts education, showcasing instances when neoliberal ideology collides with contradictory theories regarding how and why people learn and make. First, this paper will introduce the reader to the maker movement in education and review literature on making, learning, and neoliberalism. Secondly, I analyze the discourse of public librarians who implement the arts programming and suggest possible implications for how learning through the arts can be undermined by neoliberalism. And, finally, this article proposes a view of making that does align with arts education that embraces dispositional, constructionist, and post-modern/new materialist approaches to learning: Making as the reciprocal relationship between maker, material, tools, skill, and intention. This article draws on a three-year empirical study of a Public Library system's arts-based maker program called Bubbler. I will introduce the Maker Movement and review literature on making and learning. I will use discourse analysis of interviews and workshops with public librarians to highlight how neoliberal ideology collides with educational theories incongruent with this economic vision for how and why people learn and make. Finally, I will suggest possible implications for how learning through the arts can be undermined by, and move away from, these neoliberal logics. I present a view of making oriented around responsiveness and connection that aligns with learning theories towards an anti-neoliberal arts education. This study contributes to conversations about learning through art making in educational settings across the U.S. Artists have always considered themselves makers; visual artists are makers of artifacts (paintings, sculptures, etc.), while performing artists are makers of experiences (dances, plays, concerts). Per the National Arts Education standards, a core component of learning is: "Conceiving and developing new artistic ideas and work" (i.e. making; www.nationalartsstandards.org). In recent years, the term making has been claimed by what is coming to be known as "The Maker Movement"...