2012
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2012.00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning tactile skills through curious exploration

Abstract: We present curiosity-driven, autonomous acquisition of tactile exploratory skills on a biomimetic robot finger equipped with an array of microelectromechanical touch sensors. Instead of building tailored algorithms for solving a specific tactile task, we employ a more general curiosity-driven reinforcement learning approach that autonomously learns a set of motor skills in absence of an explicit teacher signal. In this approach, the acquisition of skills is driven by the information content of the sensory inpu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ideas about learning progress have shown promise in developmental robotics, allowing robots implementing these routines to "efficiently learn repertoires of skills in high dimensions and under strong time constraints and to avoid unfruitful activities that are either well learnt and trivial, or which are random and unlearnable (Pape et al 2012;Ngo et al 2012;Baranes and Oudeyer 2013;Nguyen and Oudeyer 2013)" (Gottlieb et al 2013: p. 9). There are good reasons to suspect a similar approach to learning takes place in humans.…”
Section: Novelty Seeking and Learning Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ideas about learning progress have shown promise in developmental robotics, allowing robots implementing these routines to "efficiently learn repertoires of skills in high dimensions and under strong time constraints and to avoid unfruitful activities that are either well learnt and trivial, or which are random and unlearnable (Pape et al 2012;Ngo et al 2012;Baranes and Oudeyer 2013;Nguyen and Oudeyer 2013)" (Gottlieb et al 2013: p. 9). There are good reasons to suspect a similar approach to learning takes place in humans.…”
Section: Novelty Seeking and Learning Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive architectures for active exploration, learning, information-seeking and attention with computational agents, were proposed with multiple intrinsic motivation models, e.g., information gain, predictive novelty, distributional surprise, distributional familiarity [43], [44], [45]. Learning of robot skills was investigated with intrinsically motivated movements, allowing a robot to explore interesting stimuli while maximising visual and tactile perception [46], [47]. Active exploration and intrinsic motivation allowed a robot to learn inverse models and motor primitives [48], [49].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ngo et al (2013), for example, proposed a system that generates goals based on the confidence in its predictions about how the environment reacts to its actions; when the confidence on a prediction is low, the environmental configuration that generated such an event becomes a goal. Pape et al (2012) presented a similar curiositydriven exploration behavior in the context of tactile skills learning, which allowed the robotic system to autonomously develop a small set of basic motor skills that lead to different kinds of tactile input, and to learn how to exploit the learned motor skills to solve texture classification tasks. Jauffret et al (2013) presented a neural architecture based on an online novelty detection algorithm that is able to self-evaluate sensory-motor strategies.…”
Section: Exploration As a Drive For Motor And Cognitive Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%