2008
DOI: 10.1039/b812409b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning stoichiometry: a comparison of text and multimedia formats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
37
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the overwhelming majority of empirical studies on simulations concern their general effectiveness for enhancing conceptual understanding, often investigating learning within a specifi c simulation environment (e.g., Cronj é & Fouche , 2008 ;Gazit, Yair, & Chen , 2005 ) or comparing learning outcomes and motivation between simulation and no-simulation conditions (e.g ., Evans, Yaron, & Leinhardt , 2008 ;Renken & Nunez , 2013 ;Trundle & Bell , 2010 ). A fi rst important overarching design principle for effective simulations has emerged from this research: clear goals for learning are essential ( National Research Council , 2011 ), and simulations must be designed in line with these goals ( Plass et al, 2009b ).…”
Section: Learning With Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, the overwhelming majority of empirical studies on simulations concern their general effectiveness for enhancing conceptual understanding, often investigating learning within a specifi c simulation environment (e.g., Cronj é & Fouche , 2008 ;Gazit, Yair, & Chen , 2005 ) or comparing learning outcomes and motivation between simulation and no-simulation conditions (e.g ., Evans, Yaron, & Leinhardt , 2008 ;Renken & Nunez , 2013 ;Trundle & Bell , 2010 ). A fi rst important overarching design principle for effective simulations has emerged from this research: clear goals for learning are essential ( National Research Council , 2011 ), and simulations must be designed in line with these goals ( Plass et al, 2009b ).…”
Section: Learning With Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fi eld of medicine, evidence from the use of simulations developed for a number of procedures indicates that this emerging approach has the potential to increase surgical profi ciency among doctors in training ( Tobias & Fletcher , 2011 ). Looking at simulation games, an even broader range of content areas have been investigated, for example, social sciences, geography, educational psychology, and politics ( Randel, Morris, Wetzel, & Whitehill , 1992 ).To date, the overwhelming majority of empirical studies on simulations concern their general effectiveness for enhancing conceptual understanding, often investigating learning within a specifi c simulation environment (e.g., Cronj é & Fouche , 2008 ;Gazit, Yair, & Chen , 2005 ) or comparing learning outcomes and motivation between simulation and no-simulation conditions (e.g ., Evans, Yaron, & Leinhardt , 2008 ;Renken & Nunez , 2013 ;Trundle & Bell , 2010 ). A fi rst important overarching design principle for effective simulations has emerged from this research: clear goals for learning are essential ( National Research Council , 2011 ), and simulations must be designed in line with these goals ( Plass et al, 2009b ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cook et al (2007) found no differences in student learning between a condition with end-of-module review questions that required active responses and a condition with expository end-of-module activities. Evans (2007) explored the effects of more and less expository online instruction for students learning chemistry lab procedures. After asking students to complete an online unit that was either text-based or dynamic and interactive, Evans found that SAT score and gender were stronger predictors of student performance on a posttest with conceptual and procedural items than was the type of online unit to which students were exposed.…”
Section: Learning Experience Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an online course that we developed on stoichiometry, engagement with the virtual lab, as indicated by number of virtual lab manipulations, was the best predictor of posttest performance (as compared with overall time in the online environment, Scholastic Aptitude Test score, and gender), even though the fi nal assessments were traditional stoichiometric calculations (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%