2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning person-specific models for facial expression and action unit recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [22], a two-step learning approach is proposed for personspecific pain recognition and AU detection. First, data of each subject are regarded as different source domains, and are used to train weak Adaboost classifiers.…”
Section: A Domain Adaptation In Facial Behavior Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [22], a two-step learning approach is proposed for personspecific pain recognition and AU detection. First, data of each subject are regarded as different source domains, and are used to train weak Adaboost classifiers.…”
Section: A Domain Adaptation In Facial Behavior Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, apart from [22], all the works mentioned above operate in the unsupervised setting. While this requires less effort in terms of obtaining the labels for the target subsample, its underlying assumption is that target data can be well represented as a weighted combination of the source data.…”
Section: A Domain Adaptation In Facial Behavior Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The personalized models can be divided into three groups: the person-dependent models ( [8,9,10]), the person-adaptable models ( [11,12,13,14]), and the models that use personalized facial features ( [15]). The first group uses data of both the training and test persons during learning, and these models are typically tailored to each person (training and test).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the models on the pain expression recognition task, the proposed adaptable models outperformed generic models based on the subtractive method. Similarly, [13] proposed two transfer learning algorithms: inductive and transductive transfer learning for detection of pain and AUs, in both a semi-supervised and unsupervised settings. [16] proposed a personalized model for AU detection that is based on the Kernel Mean Matching technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%